10
Total Mentions
9
Documents
447
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
Nijhawan is not a person connected to Jeffrey Epstein. All mentions refer to the Supreme Court case 'Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009)', which is cited as legal precedent in what appear to be court briefs within the Epstein document collection.
The name appears exclusively as part of a legal citation format in four documents. The case being cited dealt with immigration law and the definition of aggravated felony involving fraud - it has no substantive connection to the Epstein case itself. The documents citing this case appear to be legal briefs using it as precedent for interpreting fraud-related statutes.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
andgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994) Leocal v. Ashcroft, 11 passim 543 U.S. 1 (2004) 11 Martin v. Hadix, 527 U.S. 343 (1999) 6 Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009) 12, 13 Shular v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 779 (2020) 11, 14 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 8, 9
Page: EFTA00028905 →the government cites in which the Court applied a fact-based approach to an "offense involving" statute—does not break this line of cases at all. In Nijhawan, the statutory provision at issue referred to "an offense that . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $1
Page: EFTA00028919 →t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00022101 →t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00029550 →EFTA00102999_sub_001 - EFTA00102999_100
the categorical approach. 39 EFTA00103064 `Involving' . is equally consistent with applying a fact-based approach." 865 F.3d at 60 n.11 (citing Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 38 (2009) (applying the circumstances-specific approach to a statute containing the word "involves")). Moreover, as the Wein
EFTA00099941_sub_001 - EFTA00099941_100
he categorical approach. 39 EFTA00100006 `Involving' . . is equally consistent with applying a fact-based approach." 865 F.3d at 60 n.11 (citing Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29,38 (2009) (applying the circumstances-specific approach to a statute containing the word "involves")). Moreover, as the Weing
EFTA00077606_sub_001 - EFTA00077606_100
the categorical approach. 'Involving' . is equally consistent with applying a fact-based approach." 865 F.3d at 60 n.11 39 EFTA00077671 (citing Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 38 (2009) (applying the circumstances-specific approach to a statute containing the word "involves")). Moreover, as the Wein
EFTA00039421_sub_001 - EFTA00039421_100
the categorical approach. 'Involving' . is equally consistent with applying a fact-based approach." 865 F.3d at 60 n.11 39 EFTA00039486 (citing Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 38 (2009) (applying the circumstances-specific approach to a statute containing the word "involves")). Moreover, as the Wein
t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00020271 →EFTA00095067_sub_001 - EFTA00095067_100
r the categorical approach. `Involving' . is equally consistent with applying a fact-based approach." 865 F.3d at 60 n.I 39 EFTA00095131 (citing Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 38 (2009) (applying the circumstances-specific approach to a statute containing the word "involves")). Moreover, as the Wein

Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015

Bridges
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
USI Film Products
OrganizationAmerican manufacturer of specialty packaging films

Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Vernon
PersonAmbiguous name reference in legal citations and Epstein documents
Schneider
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
Landgraf
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Aleman
PersonSurname reference in documents
Sampson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Nejad
PersonSurname reference in documents
Bortnovsky
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Santobello
PersonLegal case citation (Santobello v. New York) in Epstein court documents

Giglio
PersonNER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States