5
Total Mentions
4
Documents
98
Connected Entities
Nijhawan is not a person connected to Jeffrey Epstein. All mentions refer to the Supreme Court case 'Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009)', which is cited as legal precedent in what appear to be court briefs within the Epstein document collection.
The name appears exclusively as part of a legal citation format in four documents. The case being cited dealt with immigration law and the definition of aggravated felony involving fraud - it has no substantive connection to the Epstein case itself. The documents citing this case appear to be legal briefs using it as precedent for interpreting fraud-related statutes.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
andgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994) Leocal v. Ashcroft, 11 passim 543 U.S. 1 (2004) 11 Martin v. Hadix, 527 U.S. 343 (1999) 6 Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009) 12, 13 Shular v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 779 (2020) 11, 14 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 8, 9
Page: EFTA00028905 →the government cites in which the Court applied a fact-based approach to an "offense involving" statute—does not break this line of cases at all. In Nijhawan, the statutory provision at issue referred to "an offense that . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $1
Page: EFTA00028919 →t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00020271 →t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00022101 →t . . . involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $10,000" is "consistent with a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thus, the word "involves" generally means that courts should look to the circumstances of an
Page: EFTA00029550 →U.S. Attorney's Office
OrganizationThe Third Circuit
OrganizationSecond Circuit
OrganizationUSI Film Products
OrganizationJeffries
PersonFamily name
Landgraf
Person
Vernon
Person
Bridges
Person
Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Schneider
PersonFamily name
8th Cir.
OrganizationDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Reid Weingarten
PersonTown in the valley of the Schussen River, in the district of Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Circuit
Organization2008 television film
D.C. Cir.
Organization
Leahy
PersonCanadian folk group originating from Lakefield, Ontario
Leo Sure Chief
Organization