
38
Total Mentions
36
Documents
658
Connected Entities
Surname reference in Epstein-related documents
EFTA00103709
arily requir[es]" that conduct. Shular v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 779, 785 (2020) (internal quotations omitted). Those cases date back at least to Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953), which construed the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act's extension of statutes of limitations for "any of
ails" or "elements of the offense" approach is particularly appropriate for three additional reasons here. First, like the Wartime Suspension Act in Bridges, § 3283 creates an "exception" to the general five-year limitations period of § 3282, and such exceptions should be "narrowly construed." Bridges,
the Sexual or Physical Abuse or Kidnapping of a Child 14 CONCLUSION 16 EFTA00028904 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209 (1953) 11, 13, 14 Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014) 14 Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group, 508 U.S. 1
Page: EFTA00028905 →elements of § 2422(a) and § 2423(a), and to disregard allegations of conduct beyond those elements. Finally, the government attempts to distinguish Bridges, in which the Supreme Court used the equivalent of a "necessarily entails" approach specifically with respect to a statute of limitations, and argu
Page: EFTA00028920 →rom: Joel Dunn < Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) To: Nicholas Gahhosiiii >; John Stepck< >; Ed Hammer< >; Bob & Sandy< >; Joe ee. seal — Bridges he ReplyTo: Joel Dunn Subject: shortest books of all time > The Shortest Books of All Time MY BLACK GIRLFRIENDS By Tiger Woods THINGS I LOVE ABO
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026517 →sco, Marin County, Mt. Tamalpais, and the Bay and Bridges, and comes with vested development rights. An inc
YAHOO_009758
sco, Marin County, Mt. Tamalpais, and the Bay and Bridges, and comes with vested development rights. An inc
YAHOO_010546
sco, Marin County, Mt. Tamalpais, and the Bay and Bridges, and comes with vested development rights. An in
YAHOO_011631
views of San Francisco, Marin County, the Bay and Bridges, and Mt. Tamalpais, the property is vested for de
idges, 20, from Stow, Ohio went into an online forum and chatted with a person he thought was with ISIS, but was in fact an FBI undercover agent. • Bridges is currently assigned to Fort Stewart in Georgia with the 3rd infantry division of the Army. He was arrested on charges of attempting to provide mat
Page: EFTA00011039 →do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00020269 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16
Page: EFTA00020270 →do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00022099 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16
Page: EFTA00022100 →do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00029548 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 208 Filed 04/16
Page: EFTA00029549 →EFTA00085225
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00085233 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00090494
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00090502 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00092755
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00092763 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00092886
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00092894 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00103273
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00103281 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00103343
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00103351 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00103308
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00103316 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00103238
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00103246 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f
EFTA00104652
do not qualify as offenses involving the sexual abuse of minors because sexual abuse is not an essential ingredient of each statutory offense. See Bridges v. United States, 346 U.S. 209, 221 (1953). In Maxwell's view, 9 EFTA00104660 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 34 f

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015

Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Hernandez
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents

Dodge
OrganizationUS automotive company
USI Film Products
OrganizationAmerican manufacturer of specialty packaging films
Schneider
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
Landgraf
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US

Napolitano
PersonReference to Janet Napolitano, former DHS Secretary

Vernon
PersonAmbiguous name reference in legal citations and Epstein documents

Medina
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to D. Medina, David Medina, and Gisela Castro Medina
Werner
PersonBishop of the Roman Catholic Church
Markiewicz
PersonSurname reference in documents