149
Total Mentions
124
Documents
7,885
Connected Entities
Ambiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
The entity 'Schneider' appears to be incidental within the Epstein-related documents, primarily found in automated email chains and generic legal citations rather than direct evidence of involvement.
Most mentions of Schneider appear in automated email chains ([email protected]) containing joke content, where 'Schneider' is part of a shoe store joke. Additional appearances are in legal case citations (United States v. Schneider) and academic references. There is no direct correspondence, flight logs, or court filings that establish a substantive connection to Epstein or his associates.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
EFTA00154640
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
EFTA02702613
fy app and type in "Jackie Martling"... It's a really nasty day, dark and pouring, and Schneider gets pulled over for speeding. The cop walks up to Schneider's window and says, "Isn't it kind of stupid to be driving so fast in this weather?" Schneider says, "Who's stupid? You're the one standing out in th
endless jokes from all of my CDs, get the Pandora or the Spotify app and type in "Jackie Martling"... It's a really nasty day, dark and pouring, and Schneider gets pulled over for speeding. The cop walks up to Schneider's window and says, "Isn't it kind of stupid to be driving so fast in this weather?" Sc
EFTA00137349
https://www.washingtonpost.com/locaUvirginia-politics/virginia-gun-rally- january/2020/11/24/02949f52-2e70-11eb-bae0-50bb17126614_story.html> (11/24, Schneider, 14.2M) reports organizers of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, "who staged a massive pro-gun rally at the state Capitol in January, say they'v
de Fake Answers For Residents. The AP <https://apnews.comlarticle/us-census-manager-counters-fake-answers- b0ecdec4d6fa4fe3a0989e5702c528ce> (11/24, Schneider) reports on "texts from an Alabama census supervisor" sent in October, which "laid out how census takers should fake data to mark households as havi
EFTA00148727
ting as much as "$870,261 per acre." EFTA00148758 In Texts, US Census Manager Told Counters To Provide Fake Answers For Residents. The AP (11/24, Schneider) reports on "texts from an Alabama census supervisor" sent in October, which "laid out how census takers should fake data to mark households as havi
ifficult in the middle of a pandemic. Pro-Gun Rally In Virginia Shut Out After Gun Control Advocates Get Permits First. The Washington Post (11/24, Schneider, 14.2M) reports organizers of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, "who staged a massive pro-gun rally at the state Capitol in January, say they'v
EFTA00714014
wife when he picks up a case of beer that's on sale and puts it in the shopping cart. His wife says, "Put that back." Walking down the next aisle, Schneider's wife picks up a big jar of face cream. He says, "What's that for?" She says, "It makes me pretty." Schneider says, "So does the beer, and that's
etta & iHeart Radio 24/7 Comedy EFTA00714022 he plays me a-plenty ... ******** What do you get if you lick a Girl Scout? Ten years. ******** Schneider's shopping with his wife when he picks up a case of beer that's on sale and puts it in the shopping cart. His wife says, "Put that back." Walking
EFTA02395490
agents. A key initiative derived from such efforts is CSPS' recently established partnership with Schneider Electric (China) Investment Co., Ltd. ("Schneider). CSPS has become the partner of choice for several of Schneider's projects in the lighting segment, which involve installations of CSPS' energy sa
tly established partnership with Schneider Electric (China) Investment Co., Ltd. ("Schneider). CSPS has become the partner of choice for several of Schneider's projects in the lighting segment, which involve installations of CSPS' energy saving devices and new generation lighting products. CSPS has also e
EFTA00104652
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00105663
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00085225
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00137248
ffort To Block Migrants From Count. The AP <https://apnews.com/article/census-2020-at-risk-data-anomalies-72faf48e34cc092af4b7c600eb6952f3> (11/19, Schneider) reports that on Thursday, Steven Dillingham, the Director of the Census Bureau, "said...that irregularities have been found during the numbers-crun
d. Reuters <https://www.reuters.cotn/article/us-usa-fed- mnuchin/mnuchin-pulls-plug-on-some-of-feds-pandemic-lending-programs-idUSKBN27Z34P> (11/19, Schneider, Saphir) says the lending programs "never got much use, but were an effort to spread a central bank safety net under as much of American business as
EFTA00461392
mes = New Roman', serif;" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-size: lipt; = font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=3D"">Dr.= Schneider will review the results and offer any = recommendations.</span><o:p = class=3D""></o:p></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class=3D""><div =
e: > =20 > Dear Lesley, > I have scheduled Mr. Epstein to see Dr. Darren Schneider immediately = following his vascular studies on Monday. > Dr. Schneider will review the results and offer any recommendations. > Please let me know if I can further assist in any way. > Thank you! > Wanda > =20 > Wan
EFTA00090494
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00621021
15-005 A001 Admin. WAPA-Transmission and Distnbution Center 15-008 A001 Admin. WICO-Havensite Mall 15-010 A001 Admin. 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Schneider Regional_RFP-15.04 16-003 A001 Admin. 1 1 2 Magens Bay_RFP-15-001 16-004 A001 Admin. ATN-Innovative-Choice Group 16-007 A001 Admin. 1
10 WAPA-lransmission & Distribution Cern.: 15-008 1 2 1 1 1 6 Keating Inn-Additional Design 15-009 WICO-Flavensite mall 15-010 1 I 1 Schneider Regional_RFP-15.04 16.003 1 2 Magens Bay RFP-15.001 16-004 ATN/Innovative/Choice Group Reno 16.007 2 1 1 Baker Residence, Parcel 23 Estate
EFTA00092755
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00092886
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00103273
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
EFTA00103343
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00103308
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00103238
that Congress intended courts to apply the statute using a case-specific approach. The Third Circuit reached the same conclusion in United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). The Court sees no reason to depart from the reasoning in Weingarten. First, "[t]he Supreme Court's modem catego
t legislative history indicating that Congress intended to apply § 3283 to a wide range of crimes against children. See Weingarten, 865 F.3d at 60; Schneider, 801 F.3d at 196. The purposes underlying the categorical approach do not apply here either. For statutes dealing with prior convictions, "[t]tle c
EFTA00226107_email_074
who is involved in the church to refuse the unwelcome sexual advances of a priest or report such an advance to his parents or the authorities. See Schneider v. Plymouth State College, 144 N.H. 458 744 A.2d 101 0999) (holding that college owed a fiduciary duty to student, and that this duty was breache
ovide and maintain a safe environment for Plaintiff to participate in church activities. See Moses, 863 P2d at 321 n. 13; Lee- dom, 117 A. at 411; Schneider, 744 A2d at 105-06. No inquiry need be made into church doctrine or other ecclesiastical matters. No professional standard of care need be set f

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)

Donald Trump
PersonPresident of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
Leon Black
PersonAmerican billionaire businessman (born 1951)

George W. Bush
PersonPresident of the United States from 2001 to 2009

Joe Biden
Person46th President of the United States (2021–2025)

Virginia Giuffre
PersonAdvocate for sex trafficking victims (1983–2025)

Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement

Julie K. Brown
PersonAmerican journalist

George Mitchell
PersonFormer U.S. Senator from Maine and special envoy, connected to Epstein through flight logs and social events

Michigan
LocationState of the United States of America
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States

Stephen Hawking
PersonBritish theoretical physicist, cosmologist and author (1942–2018)

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US

Michael Jackson
PersonAmerican singer, songwriter, record producer, and dancer (1958–2009)

Prince Charles
PersonKing of the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms since 2022 (born 1948)