Back to People & Entities
BO
Bortnovsky
Person
8
Total Mentions
8
Documents
125
Connected Entities
Kris Bortnovsky is mentioned in the context of legal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, specifically concerning the need for sufficient information to prepare a defense and avoid unfair surprise at trial. He is also a former hedge fund manager who was recently indicted on charges of insider trading and obstruction of justice.
Bortnovsky's appearances in the documents stem from citations of the legal case *United States v. Bortnovsky*, 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987), regarding the purpose of a bill of particulars in ensuring a fair trial. This legal precedent is invoked in arguments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense, as these documents pertain to motions to compel the government to provide more specific information. Recent news articles detail Bortnovsky's indictment for insider trading and obstruction of justice, with allegations of using non-public information to make profitable stock trades and intimidating a witness.
Key Highlights
- •Bortnovsky is cited in legal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case concerning the right to a fair trial.
- •The citations reference *United States v. Bortnovsky*, 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) regarding the function of a bill of particulars.
- •Kris Bortnovsky was recently indicted on charges of insider trading and obstruction of justice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (8)
1 mention
. See also United States v. Rigas, 490 F.3d 208, 237 (2d Cir. 2007); United States v. Davidoff 845 F.2d 1151, 1154 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Crim
Page: EFTA00016141 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00020279 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00022109 →Sponsored
1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). "The purpose of a bill of particulars is to supplement the allegations in the indictment when necessary to (1) en
Page: EFTA00023905 →1 mention
vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des
Page: EFTA00023911 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The SI superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00029558 →Sponsored
1 mention
on of the allegations specified below in order to permit Ms. Maxwell to prepare her defense and avoid unfair surprise at trial. See United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Superseding Indictment does not sufficiently inform Ms. Maxwell of the specific conduct of which she is accu
Page: EFTA00030934 →1 mention
vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des
Page: EFTA00030944 →Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 125)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
8 docs8 co-mentions
District Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization7 docs7 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
7 docs7 co-mentions
Second Circuit
Organization7 docs7 co-mentions
Giglio
Person6 docs6 co-mentions
U.S. Attorney's Office
Organization5 docs5 co-mentions
Brady
PersonCity in and county seat of McCulloch County, Texas, United States
5 docs5 co-mentions
Jencks
PersonAmerican architecture theorist, critic and landscape architect (1939–2019)
5 docs5 co-mentions
LA
Landgraf
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
TR
Tramunti
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
Circuit
Organization2008 television film
4 docs4 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
4 docs4 co-mentions
FBI
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
AN
Annabi
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
Southern District of Florida
Location4 docs4 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonResearcher
4 docs4 co-mentions
Gonzalez
PersonColombian actor, songwriter, singer, dancer
4 docs4 co-mentions
CO
Coppa
PersonComposer
4 docs4 co-mentions
Alison J. Nathan
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
NE
Nersesian
Person4 docs4 co-mentions