Back to People & Entities
BO
Bortnovsky
Person
34
Total Mentions
34
Documents
559
Connected Entities
Surname reference in Epstein-related documents
Kris Bortnovsky is mentioned in the context of legal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, specifically concerning the need for sufficient information to prepare a defense and avoid unfair surprise at trial. He is also a former hedge fund manager who was recently indicted on charges of insider trading and obstruction of justice.
Bortnovsky's appearances in the documents stem from citations of the legal case *United States v. Bortnovsky*, 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987), regarding the purpose of a bill of particulars in ensuring a fair trial. This legal precedent is invoked in arguments related to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense, as these documents pertain to motions to compel the government to provide more specific information. Recent news articles detail Bortnovsky's indictment for insider trading and obstruction of justice, with allegations of using non-public information to make profitable stock trades and intimidating a witness.
Key Highlights
- •Bortnovsky is cited in legal documents related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case concerning the right to a fair trial.
- •The citations reference *United States v. Bortnovsky*, 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) regarding the function of a bill of particulars.
- •Kris Bortnovsky was recently indicted on charges of insider trading and obstruction of justice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (20 of 34)
1 mention
. See also United States v. Rigas, 490 F.3d 208, 237 (2d Cir. 2007); United States v. Davidoff 845 F.2d 1151, 1154 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Crim
Page: EFTA00016141 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00020279 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00022109 →Sponsored
1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). "The purpose of a bill of particulars is to supplement the allegations in the indictment when necessary to (1) en
Page: EFTA00023905 →1 mention
vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des
Page: EFTA00023911 →1 mention
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The SI superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Page: EFTA00029558 →Sponsored
1 mention
on of the allegations specified below in order to permit Ms. Maxwell to prepare her defense and avoid unfair surprise at trial. See United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Superseding Indictment does not sufficiently inform Ms. Maxwell of the specific conduct of which she is accu
Page: EFTA00030934 →1 mention
vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des
Page: EFTA00030944 →EFTA00040628.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00040628
n Laden, 92 F.Supp.2d 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) 11 United States v. Bonventre, 10 Cr. 228 (LTS), 2013 WL 2303726 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 6, 13 United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) (per curiam) 6, 10, 20 United States v. Carroll, No. 19 CR 545 (CM), 2020 WL 1862446 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2020) .... 9
Sponsored
EFTA00085225.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00085225
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00090494.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00090494
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00092755.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092755
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Sponsored
EFTA00092886.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092886
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00095587.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00095587
vent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should [the defendant] be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The Indictment contains a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offenses charged, and it des
EFTA00096232.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00096232
. See also United States v. Rigas, 490 F.3d 208, 237 (2d Cir. 2007); United States v. Davidoff 845 F.2d 1151, 1154 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). Accordingly, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Crim
Sponsored
EFTA00103273.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103273
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00103343.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103343
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00103308.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103308
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
Sponsored
EFTA00103238.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103238
rial, to prevent surprise, and to interpose a plea of double jeopardy should he be prosecuted a second time for the same offense." United States v. Bortnovsky, 820 F.2d 572, 574 (2d Cir. 1987). The S1 superseding indictment sets out the elements of each charged crime and the facts supporting each element.
EFTA00103758.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103758
8 Wall.) 163 (1873) 18 North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969) 18 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) United States v. Bortnovsky, passim 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) 22, 23 United States v. Brown, No. 99-1230(L), 2002 WL 34244994 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2002) 16 United States v
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 559)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
33 docs33 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
31 docs31 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
29 docs29 co-mentions
Giglio
PersonNER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
28 docs28 co-mentions
AN
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
26 docs26 co-mentions
Southern District of New York
OrganizationFederal judicial district covering Manhattan and surrounding areas
25 docs25 co-mentions
RU
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
25 docs25 co-mentions
TH
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
25 docs25 co-mentions
WA
Walker
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
24 docs24 co-mentions
ET
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents
24 docs24 co-mentions
CO
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
24 docs24 co-mentions
TR
Tracy
PersonAmbiguous first name - refers to multiple Tracys including Tracy Chapell and Tracy Lofaro in Epstein documents
24 docs24 co-mentions
Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
23 docs23 co-mentions
Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
22 docs22 co-mentions
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States
22 docs22 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
22 docs22 co-mentions
Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
21 docs21 co-mentions
NE
Nejad
PersonSurname reference in documents
21 docs21 co-mentions
Forde
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents
20 docs20 co-mentions
SA
Sampson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
20 docs20 co-mentions