
149
Total Mentions
119
Documents
1,073
Connected Entities
NER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
The documents suggest "Giglio" refers to the Supreme Court case *Giglio v. United States*, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), concerning the prosecution's duty to disclose information that could impeach the credibility of a witness. Mentions of Giglio appear to relate to requests for exculpatory or impeaching material relevant to witness testimony in the context of legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
The name "Giglio" appears 36 times in the document set, primarily in legal contexts. The majority of these mentions reference *Giglio v. United States* and the associated legal obligations for the prosecution to disclose information that could impeach the credibility of a government witness. The documents also mention requests for "Jencks Act and Giglio materials".

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
EFTA00103273
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
EFTA00212253
y Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) 6 2.8% Failure to competently and/or diligently represent the client's interests 16 7.5% Failure to comply with Brady, Giglio, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 discovery 50 23.5% Failure to comply with court orders or federal rules I I 5.2% Conflict of interest 2 0.9% Failur
or authorized to do so by the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General. Typical misconduct allegations that OPR investigates include Brady, Giglio, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, and civil discovery violations; improper conduct before a grand jury; improper coercion or intimidation of
EFTA00092755
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00099671
nment will continue to produce any portion of those materials that warrants disclosure in this case, including in connection with its production of Giglio and 3500 material. EFTA00099677 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 63 Filed 10/07/20 Page 8 of 8 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 8
exculpatory material of which it becomes aware. The Government's Rule 16 discovery productions do not include witness statements or material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny, consistent with the common practice and law within this Circuit. As indicated in a prior lett
EFTA00103238
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
EFTA00154640
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00085225
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00092427
exculpatory material of which it becomes aware. The Government's Rule 16 discovery productions do not include witness statements or material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny, consistent with the common practice and law within this Circuit. As indicated in a prior lett
nment will continue to produce any portion of those materials that warrants disclosure in this case, including in connection with its production of Giglio and 3500 material. EFTA00092433 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 8 IV. Conclusion Consistent with its representations to the C
EFTA00097964
exculpatory material of which it becomes aware. The Government's Rule 16 discovery productions do not include witness statements or material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny, consistent with the common practice and law within this Circuit. As indicated in a prior lett
nment will continue to produce any portion of those materials that warrants disclosure in this case, including in connection with its production of Giglio and 3500 material. EFTA00097970 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 8 IV. Conclusion Consistent with its representations to the C
EFTA00098805
nment will continue to produce any portion of those materials that warrants disclosure in this case, including in connection with its production of Giglio and 3500 material. EFTA00098811 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 8 IV. Conclusion Consistent with its representations to the C
exculpatory material of which it becomes aware. The Government's Rule 16 discovery productions do not include witness statements or material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny, consistent with the common practice and law within this Circuit. As indicated in a prior lett
EFTA00103343
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
EFTA00103308
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00104652
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00105663
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00066553
Aug. 25, 2020, Dkt. 49, at 2). Most notably, the defendant's accusations against the Government rely on a blurring of the line between Rule 16 and Giglio or Jencks Act material, as well as the same faulty definition of exculpatory material that has no basis in law. (See Gov. Ltr. dated Aug. 13, 2020,
il shortly before trial); Gov. Ltr. dated Oct. 7, 2020, Dkt. No. 63, at 2 (noting that Rule 16 does not require production of witness statements or Giglio); Gov. Ltr. dated Oct. 20, 2020, Dkt. No. 65, at 1-2 (noting well-established law in this Circuit precluding defense from offering evidence that a
EFTA00078120
Cr. 911 (LBS), 2009 WL 637164, at *14 (S.D.N.Y. March II, 2009) ("The Second Circuit has held that a request for immediate or early disclosure [of Giglio material] has no basis in the law.") Because the Government's brief delay in completing discovery does not entitle the defense to such materials mo
der, the Government is prepared to engage in good faith discussions with the defense about an appropriate schedule for disclosure of Jencks Act and Giglio material. The standard practice in this District is to produce such material shortly in advance of trial, a practice that has been widely held to be
EFTA00087761
nment will continue to produce any portion of those materials that warrants disclosure in this case, including in connection with its production of Giglio and 3500 material. EFTA00087767 Honorable Alison J. Nathan October 7, 2020 Page 8 IV. Conclusion Consistent with its representations to the C
exculpatory material of which it becomes aware. The Government's Rule 16 discovery productions do not include witness statements or material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny, consistent with the common practice and law within this Circuit. As indicated in a prior lett
EFTA00090494
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
EFTA00092886
ire the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness."
in its possession and has failed to produce. She also seeks accelerated disclosure of the Government's witness list, Jencks Act material, Brady and Giglio material, co-conspirator statements, and Rule 404(b) material. Based on the Government's response in briefing and letters the parties have since su
view that the fact of production of materials is Giglio? Or that the substance of her attorney's request and the government's responsive letter is Giglio? Just want to make sure we understand the theory. thanks, From: S (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2020 13:44 To: ) < ;'; Cc: (USANYS) < (U
Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) < ; BTW, I probably don't need to tell you, our Touhy communications with El are probably disclosable as Giglio info. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:32 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) < >; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requ

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein

Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States

Southern District of New York
OrganizationFederal judicial district covering Manhattan and surrounding areas
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City

Audrey Strauss
PersonActing U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York who announced charges against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2020
Bortnovsky
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
Jencks Act
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Second Circuit
OrganizationU.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Coppa
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents