Who is Santobello in the Epstein files?

Rudolph Santobello himself does not appear to have any direct connection to Epstein. However, a Supreme Court case bearing his name, *Santobello v. New York*, is cited in legal arguments related to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The case establishes that the government must fulfill promises made during plea bargains.

What is *Santobello v. New York*?

It is a United States Supreme Court case from 1971. The court ruled that if a plea agreement includes a promise from the prosecutor, that promise must be honored. In the case, the prosecutor agreed not to recommend a sentence, but a new prosecutor recommended the maximum sentence, violating the agreement.

Why is a Supreme Court case relevant to the Epstein documents?

The *Santobello v. New York* case sets a legal precedent regarding plea agreements. Lawyers and courts often refer to established precedents when making legal arguments and judgements. In the Epstein documents, it is used when arguing about the validity and implications of the non-prosecution agreement.

Who is Santobello in the Epstein files?

Rudolph Santobello himself does not appear to have any direct connection to Epstein. However, a Supreme Court case bearing his name, *Santobello v. New York*, is cited in legal arguments related to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The case establishes that the government must fulfill promises made during plea bargains.

What is *Santobello v. New York*?

It is a United States Supreme Court case from 1971. The court ruled that if a plea agreement includes a promise from the prosecutor, that promise must be honored. In the case, the prosecutor agreed not to recommend a sentence, but a new prosecutor recommended the maximum sentence, violating the agreement.

Why is a Supreme Court case relevant to the Epstein documents?

The *Santobello v. New York* case sets a legal precedent regarding plea agreements. Lawyers and courts often refer to established precedents when making legal arguments and judgements. In the Epstein documents, it is used when arguing about the validity and implications of the non-prosecution agreement.

Back to People & Entities

Santobello

Person

Total Mentions

Documents

Connected Entities

Rudolph Santobello was a New York mobster, but the mentions in the documents refer to the Supreme Court case *Santobello v. New York*, which concerns plea bargains. This case is referenced in legal arguments related to the Epstein case.

Santobello appears in four documents, all of which cite the Supreme Court case *Santobello v. New York*. This case is used as a legal precedent regarding plea agreements, specifically in the context of arguments about the non-prosecution agreement related to Jeffrey Epstein. The mentions are therefore indirect, referencing a legal principle rather than Santobello's direct involvement.

Key Highlights

•The documents cite *Santobello v. New York*, a Supreme Court case about plea bargain agreements.
•The legal citation is used in arguments concerning the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case.
•Rudolph Santobello was a New York mobster.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Mentions (4)

EFTA00010474 - EFTA00010493

1 mention

--- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 5 of 20 obligations undertaken therein to be set aside! See, e.g., Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971) ("[W]hen a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can b

Page: EFTA00010478 →

EFTA00020261 - EFTA00020294

1 mention

U.S. Attorney makes a promise as part of a plea bargain, both contract principles and due process require the federal government to fulfill it. See Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262 (1971); United States v. Ready, 82 F.3d 551, 558 (2d Cir. 1996). The question here is not whether the U.S. Attorney f

Page: EFTA00020264 →