ext 1 Outgoing S 0.05 2/13/04 Miami. FL 1:09 PM • ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Miami. Ft. 231 PM • ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Marra, Ft. 2:48 PM ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Miami, FL 2:54 PM ext 1 Outgoing S 0.05 211304 Miami. FL 2:57 PM ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05

ext 1 Outgoing S 0.05 2/13/04 Miami. FL 1:09 PM • ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Miami. Ft. 231 PM • ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Marra, Ft. 2:48 PM ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05 2/13/04 Miami, FL 2:54 PM ext 1 Outgoing S 0.05 211304 Miami. FL 2:57 PM ext 1 Outgoing $ 0.05

2 - 3129/04 Miami, FL 9.52 PM (F) 2 • $ • S 3/29/04 Miami, FL 9:53 PM (F) *1 • $ 3/29/04 Incoming 10:12PM (F) 1 S - $ 3/30/04 Miarra. FL 7:48 AM (F) 1 $ $ 3/30/04 Miami, FL 7:51 AM (F) 10 S $ 3/30/04 Miami. FL 8:00 AM (F) 1 • $ 3/30/04 Incoming 8:01 AM (F) 4 •

ay, and what would your response be though to -- 4 are you -- are you aware of the CVRA litigation that went on? 5 6 7 8 A Yes. Q From Judge Marra? A Yes. Q So, one of the issues that comes up in Judge 9 Marra's decision is, he made a finding that the government 10 violated the CVRA beca

ation that went on? 5 6 7 8 A Yes. Q From Judge Marra? A Yes. Q So, one of the issues that comes up

ay, and what would your response be though to -- 4 are you -- are you aware of the CVRA litigation that went on? 5 6 7 8 A Yes. Q From Judge Marra? A Yes. Q So, one of the issues that comes up in Judge 9 Marra's decision is, he made a finding that the government 10 violated the CVRA beca

har Arnale, VI 3:03 PM 1 S $ 0.69 $ 0.69 9/03/05 Incoming 4:38 PM Bkxiced NBR 3 $ - S. 9/03/05 Miami, FL 6:25 PM 1 S - $ 9/03/05 Marra. FL 7:52 PM t $ • S • 9,04/05 W Path Bch, Ft. 9:05 AM 1 S S 9/04/05 W Palm Bch, FL 9:13 AM 1 • $ 9.04/05 Incoming 11:05 AM 1 • $

har Arnale, VI 3:03 PM 1 S $ 0.69 $ 0.69 9/03/05 Incoming 4:38 PM Bkxiced NBR 3 $ - S. 9/03/05 Miami, FL 6:25 PM 1 S - $ 9/03/05 Marra. FL 7:52 PM t $ • S • 9,04/05 W Path Bch, Ft. 9:05 AM 1 S S 9/04/05 W Palm Bch, FL 9:13 AM 1 • $ 9.04/05 Incoming 11:05 AM 1 • $

har Arnale, VI 3:03 PM 1 S $ 0.69 $ 0.69 9/03/05 Incoming 4:38 PM Bkxiced NBR 3 $ - S. 9/03/05 Miami, FL 6:25 PM 1 S - $ 9/03/05 Marra. FL 7:52 PM t $ • S • 9,04/05 W Path Bch, Ft. 9:05 AM 1 S S 9/04/05 W Palm Bch, FL 9:13 AM 1 • $ 9.04/05 Incoming 11:05 AM 1 • $

1 - S 4/05/05 New York. NY 9:31 PM (F) 1 3 $ 4/05/05 New Volt, WY 9:34 PM (F) • - $ $ 4/05/05 Miami, FL 10:16 PM 2 - $ 4106/05 Marra. FL 9:52 AM (F) 4 - $ 4/06/05 Incoming 1:57 PM 1 - $ 4/06/05 New York, NY 201 PM $ S 4/06/05 Miami. FL 6:13PM (F) 1 - $ $ 4/06/

1 - S 4/05/05 New York. NY 9:31 PM (F) 1 3 $ 4/05/05 New Volt, WY 9:34 PM (F) • - $ $ 4/05/05 Miami, FL 10:16 PM 2 - $ 4106/05 Marra. FL 9:52 AM (F) 4 - $ 4/06/05 Incoming 1:57 PM 1 - $ 4/06/05 New York, NY 201 PM $ S 4/06/05 Miami. FL 6:13PM (F) 1 - $ $ 4/06/

1 - S 4/05/05 New York. NY 9:31 PM (F) 1 3 $ 4/05/05 New Volt, WY 9:34 PM (F) • - $ $ 4/05/05 Miami, FL 10:16 PM 2 - $ 4106/05 Marra. FL 9:52 AM (F) 4 - $ 4/06/05 Incoming 1:57 PM 1 - $ 4/06/05 New York, NY 201 PM $ S 4/06/05 Miami. FL 6:13PM (F) 1 - $ $ 4/06/

eview of this boot Steve Chagnon; Vincenzo &Susy Marra; Giovanni Grippando; Regina Kipnis; Ellen Wickers

eview of this boot Steve Chagnon; Vincenzo &Susy Marra; Giovanni Grippando; Regina Kipnis; Ellen Wickers

eview of this boot Steve Chagnon; Vincenzo &Susy Marra; Giovanni Grippando; Regina Kipnis; Ellen Wickers

I l l W ME: Trectira Has CC ell Sontere X Marra I; et 2 CARPENTER & CO canton Adam 20 UNIVE

I l l W ME: Trectira Has CC ell Sontere X Marra I; et 2 CARPENTER & CO canton Adam 20 UNIVE

I l l W ME: Trectira Has CC ell Sontere X Marra I; et 2 CARPENTER & CO canton Adam 20 UNIVE

he investigation was "particularly problematic." Judge Marra rejected the government's claim that the CVRA req

described above — thereby avoiding any need for the court to make a determination as to how to proceed." The filing comes after U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted summary judgment to the two victims, listed as Jane Does, who sued the government in 2008 alleging that prosecutors had violated the CVRA wi

he government's decision to hide its intentions and to tell victims to just be patient with the investigation was "particularly problematic." Judge Marra rejected the government's claim that the CVRA requires victims to be notified only of a plea bargain or a deferred prosecution agreement, both of wh

einberg said. "We believe the issue raised before Judge Marra has importance beyond just the litigation between

talks would be undermined if U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach allows the correspondence to b

ges against Epstein. The defense attorneys’ motion to intervene states the sanctity of plea talks would be undermined if U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach allows the correspondence to be used in the third-party civil action brought by the alleged victims. New York litigator Jay Lefko

Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 260 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2009 Page 6 of 6 /

, from going forward. For the reasons stated in Judge Marra’s Order of August 5, 2009, dealing with the nearl

ive order to prevent the deposition of Dr. Serge Thys, presently scheduled for August 31, 2009, from going forward. For the reasons stated in Judge Marra’s Order of August 5, 2009, dealing with the nearly identical issue, said motion as it relates to Dr. Thys, is denied. In the same Motion at issue her

--- CVRA, are contrary to law, and may cause unintended harm to the victims whose interests are also protected by the CVRA." U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted summary judgment in February to the two victims, listed as Jane Does, who sued the government in 2008 alleging that prosecutors had violat

government's decision to hide its intentions and to tell victims to just be patient with the investigation was "particularly problematic." Judge Marra rejected the government's claim that the CVRA requires victims to be notified only of a plea bargain or a deferred prosecution agreement, both of

e investigation was "particularly problematic." Judge Marra rejected the government's claim that the CVRA re

e, and the FBI, for engaging in 22 widespread sexual misconduct involving underage females. 23 The second thing we're investigating is Judge 24 Marra's finding of February of this year, 2019, that the 25 government may have violated -- or, actually, he found the EFTA00009232 --- PAGE BREAK ---

e, and the FBI, for engaging in 22 widespread sexual misconduct involving underage females. 23 The second thing we're investigating is Judge 24 Marra's finding of February of this year, 2019, that the 25 government may have violated -- or, actually, he found the EFTA00009232 --- PAGE BREAK ---

e, and the FBI, for engaging in 22 widespread sexual misconduct involving underage females. 23 The second thing we're investigating is Judge 24 Marra's finding of February of this year, 2019, that the 25 government may have violated -- or, actually, he found the EFTA00009232 --- PAGE BREAK ---

dge to throw out the nonprosecution agreement that Acosta forged with Epstein's star-studded legal team. NOT A CERTIFIED COPY U.S. District Judge Kenenth Marra has already ruled that Acosta violated the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act by not telling Epstein's victims about the agreement before it was inke

on dozens of federal charges in connection with the girls' claims that he paid them for sex at his Palm Beach mansion, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra ruled on Thursday. In a blistering 33-page ruling, Marra meticulously and methodically detailed the numerous steps federal prosecutors took to hid

rtain rights for crime victims, including the right to be informed about plea agreements and the right to appear at sentencing. U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra recently ruled that federal prosecutors violated the CVRA by failing to notify Epstein’s victims before allowing him to plead guilty to only the two

orneys representing two of the 30 young women prosecutors say Epstein molested lodged their final written pleas aimed at spurring U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra to force federal officials to reopen their investigation into the sordid case. U.S. government lawyers in September will have another chance to defe

they violated the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act by failing to alert Epstein’s victims of the terms of what some describe as a “sweetheart deal.” Marra could make a decision as early as this fall. The stakes for all crime victims are high, said attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, who filed t

against them,” Edwards and Cassell wrote. While Judge Marra could allow a jury to decide the complex case, pr

rey Epstein, shown in 2004, that they intended to enter into an agreement not to prosecute him, a judge said Thursday. (Getty) U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted summary judgment to two Epstein victims who sued the government over the deal and said federal prosecutors failed to comply with their obl

nformation to victims, it cannot be misleading," Judge Marra said. "While the government spent untold hours n

ic," according to the judge. EFTA00032506 --- PAGE BREAK --- "When the government gives information to victims, it cannot be misleading," Judge Marra said. "While the government spent untold hours negotiating the terms and implications of the NPA with Epstein's attorneys, scant information was s

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

scind the provisions in the non-prosecution agreement barring prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators and reopen the investigation. As Judge Marra has clearly ruled, your Office entered into those particular provisions with Epstein in 2007 illegally. We ask that you now extend to our clients —

ts associated with the settlement conference. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of May, 2019. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge EFTA00027808

co-conspirators and reopen the investigation. As Judge Marra has clearly ruled, your Office entered into those

ON AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter comes before the undersigned on an Order of Transfer to United States District Court Judge Kenneth A Marra signed by United States District Court Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley. (DE 5). The undersigned certifies that the above-styled case presently has no refe

gned certifies that the above-styled case presently has no referred, fully briefed pending motions and is therefore ready to be transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of Court shall hereby transfer the Magistrate Judge assignment for the instant case to United States Magistra

tions and is therefore ready to be transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of Court s

e for the Southern District ofFlorida, Kenneth A. Marra, ruled in 2019 that federal prosecutors violated

luding the right i to be informed about plea agreements and the right to appear at sentencing. U.S. District Judge for the Southern District ofFlorida, Kenneth A. Marra, ruled in 2019 that federal prosecutors violated the CVRA by failing to notify Epstein’s victims before allowing him to pjead guilty to only the two

TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do

Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 554 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2010 Page 3 of 3

to buy silence, he may succeed in shuttering the window of accountability pried open in a South Florida court back in February. U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors — led by the EFTA00019249 --- PAGE BREAK --- current labor secretary, Alexander Acosta — broke the law by entering

back in February. U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors — led by the EFTA