Back to People & Entities
N.D. Cal.
Location
22
Total Mentions
21
Documents
205
Connected Entities
N.D. Cal. is the legal abbreviation for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, appearing in the Epstein files exclusively as case citations in legal briefs and court filings.
All 22 mentions of N.D. Cal. appear in legal citations within court documents, primarily in bail arguments and legal motions related to the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The references cite precedents from cases like United States v. Chen, United States v. Casteneda, and other federal cases heard in the Northern District of California. These citations are used by attorneys to support legal arguments about bail conditions, extradition waivers, electronic monitoring, and other procedural matters—they are not evidence of any substantive connection to Epstein or his network.
Key Highlights
- •N.D. Cal. is a standard legal abbreviation for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, based in San Francisco
- •All appearances are case law citations used as legal precedent in Epstein/Maxwell court filings
- •The most frequently cited case is United States v. Casteneda (2018), referenced in multiple bail-related arguments about electronic monitoring limitations
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Document Mentions (20 of 21)
2 mentions
ies Bail 10 CONCLUSION 10 i EFTA00016770 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205 (N.D. Cal. 1992) 10 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2d 887 (8th Cir. 1985) 1 EFTA00016771 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A. Julie Addendum
Page: EFTA00016771 →ny extradition waiver would be enforced. However, "Section 3142 does not seek ironclad guarantees." United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205, 1208 (N.D. Cal. 1992). To the extent that Ms. Maxwell's ties to France and the United Kingdom—where she has not lived for nearly 30 years—create a flight risk, her
Page: EFTA00016782 →1 mention
not compelled incriminations and may be used as evidence in criminal prosecution); Ebay, Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc., 2010 WL 147967 *8 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (holding that a person cannot incriminate himself by turning over a document already in the government’s possession); Federal Savings and Loa
1 mention
onic monitoring “at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant’s head start”); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262,
Sponsored
1 mention
d in §2255. "18 U.S.C. §2255 gives victims of sexual conduct who are minors a private right of action." Martinez v. White, 492 F.Supp.2d 1186, 1188 (N.D. Cal. 2007), (emphasis added). 18 U.S.C.A. §2255 "merely provides a cause of action for damages in 'any appropriate United States District Court."' Id, a
1 mention
0 of 50 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docke(03/12/2009 Page 6 of 21 C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 6 F.Supp.2d 1186, 1188 (N.D. Cal. 2007), (emphasis added). 18 U.S.C.A. §2255 "merely provides a cause of action for damages in 'any appropriate United States District Court."' Id, a
1 mention
igital Point Solutions, Inc., 2010 WL 147967 *8 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (holding that a person cannot incriminate
Sponsored
1 mention
igital Point Solutions, Inc., 2010 WL 147967 *8 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (holding that a person cannot incriminate
1 mention
pp. 2d 115, 119 (N.D.N.Y. 2004); United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129, 132-33 (D.D.C. 2004); United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205, 1212 (N.D. Cal. 1992). In those cases, the courts included such waivers as one among several conditions of release, but they did not make any express determination
Page: EFTA00013318 →1 mention
05792 (N.D. Okla. Feb. 8, 2013); US u. Afyare, No. 3:10-er-00260, 2011 WL 1397820 (M.D. Tenn. April 13, 2011); US u. Gardner, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2007). EFTA00014484 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 22 Filed 07/16/19 Page 4 of 9 Hon. Richard M. Berman July 16, 2019 Page
Page: EFTA00014485 →Sponsored
1 mention
nic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 3141026
Page: EFTA00015539 →1 mention
ies Bail 10 CONCLUSION 10 i EFTA00015978 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Pagets) Cases United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205 (N.D. Cal. 1992) 10 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2d 887 (8th Cir. 1985) 1 EFTA00015979 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A. Julie Addendu
Page: EFTA00015979 →1 mention
uotation omitted). This rebuttable presumption can be readily satisfied, United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756 MAG (DMR), 2011 WL 3421321, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011), and "[a]ny evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a category listed in § 3142(g) can affect the operation" of the presum
Page: EFTA00018528 →Sponsored
1 mention
tifies Bail 10 CONCLUSION 10 EFTA00019292 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205 (N.D. Cal. 1992) 10 United States v. Orta, 760 F.2d 887 (8th Cir. 1985) 1 EFTA00019293 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A. Julie Addendu
Page: EFTA00019293 →1 mention
onic monitoring "at best . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262,
Page: EFTA00024591 →1 mention
e Court's assessment of whether the Defendant poses a risk of flight. See United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547 (SI), 2010 WL 5387757, at *9 n.11 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20,2010). And that same uncertainty—and the possibility that she will be able to successfully resist, or at least delay, extradition—incentiviz
Page: EFTA00027369 →Sponsored
1 mention
ic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262,
Page: EFTA00028304 →1 mention
nic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 3141026
Page: EFTA00028792 →1 mention
onic monitoring "at best . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262,
Page: EFTA00029011 →Sponsored
1 mention
os. 12 Cr. 502, 12 Cr. 645, 2013 WL 12131300, at *7 (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2013); United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757, at *9 n. I I (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (
Page: EFTA00030252 →ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
1 mentionHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017713
Feb 28, 2019Source: House Oversight Committee
336 ELR. Rep. No. 94-414, at 12 (1975) (Conf. Rep.), reprinted in 1975 U.S.C.C.AN. 713, 716. 337 United States v. Laurins, 660 F. Supp. 1579, 1584 (N.D. Cal. 1987). 338 See 1/8 U.S.C. § 3432 (2006). 339 See id. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017675 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 41 of 78 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017676 →Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 205)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
19 docs19 co-mentions
Second Circuit
Organization14 docs14 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
14 docs14 co-mentions
District Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization11 docs11 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonTown in the valley of the Schussen River, in the district of Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
9 docs9 co-mentions
Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
9 docs9 co-mentions
ZA
Zarger
Person9 docs9 co-mentions
MA
Martir
Person8 docs8 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
8 docs8 co-mentions
MW
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
8 docs8 co-mentions
BE
Benatar
Person8 docs8 co-mentions
Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official
8 docs8 co-mentions
CA
Casteneda
Person8 docs8 co-mentions
PI
Pitman
Person8 docs8 co-mentions
Richard M. Berman
PersonAmerican judge
8 docs8 co-mentions
Anderson
PersonBrazilian association football player (born 1988)
8 docs8 co-mentions
Pretrial Services
Organization8 docs8 co-mentions
Circuit
Organization2008 television film
7 docs7 co-mentions
Contreras
Person7 docs7 co-mentions
AN
Annabi
Person7 docs7 co-mentions