uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

vert Acts 17. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere: a. Between in or about 1994 and in or about 1997, when Minor Victim-1 was under the age of 18, MAXWELL participated in multiple g

vert Acts 17. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere: a. Between in or about 1994 and in or about 1997, when Minor Victim-1 was under the age of 18, MAXWELL participated in multiple g

ew York, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, having taken an oath to testify truthfully in a deposition in connection with a case then pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 15 Civ. 7433, knowingly made false material declarations, to wit, MAXWELL gave the following underlined false testimony: Q:

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

uthern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and place: Appearance Date: July 24, 2019 Appearance Time: 10:00 a.m. to testify and give evidence in regard to an a

ecific events and acts of abuse detailed above. STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS 9. From at least in or about 1994, up to and including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, con

ecific events and acts of abuse detailed above. STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS 9. From at least in or about 1994, up to and including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, con

ecific events and acts of abuse detailed above. STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS 9. From at least in or about 1994, up to and including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, con

MAXWELL, the defendant, having taken an oath to testify truthfully in a deposition in connection with a case then pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 15 Civ. 7344, knowingly made false material declarations, to wit, MAXWELL gave the following underlined false testimony: Q.

ecific events and acts of abuse detailed above. STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS 9. From at least in or about 1994, up to and including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, con

minal penalties, in addition to other penalties of the Law. DATED: New York, New York July 28, 2021 /s AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Email: Telephone: Rev. 02.01.12 EFTA00018022

HERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TO: GREETINGS: WE COMMAND YOU that all and singular business and excuses being laid aside, you appear and attend before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and pl

ed several civil 12 EFTA00018530 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 18 Filed 07/10/20 Page 17 of 26 cases related to Epstein in the Southern District of New York and has sat for depositions in those cases. Similarly, throughout the course of the criminal investigation of this case, which has been publicly re

d States v. Crowell, No. 06-CR-29IE(F), 2006 WL 3541736 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2006) 11 United States v Deutsch, No. 18-CR-502 (FB), 2020 WL 3577398 (E.D.N.Y. July 1, 2020) 11, 18 United States v. DiGiacomo, 746 F. Supp. 1176 (D. Mass. 1990) 14 United States v Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1986

lorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Col

fre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” 32. Maxwell made the same false and defamatory statements as set forth above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxw

r release on July 14, 2020, the Court DENIES the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail.' I. Background On June 29, 2020, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a six-count Indictment against the Defendant, charging her with facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of multiple minor victims betw

e, e.g., United States v. Grillo, No. 99-1514, 1999 WL 1456536, at *2 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999); United States v. Salvagno, 314 F. Supp. 2d 115, 119 (N.D.N.Y. 2004); United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129, 132-33 (D.D.C. 2004); United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205, 1212 (N.D. Cal. 1992). In those

ew York, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, having taken an oath to testify truthfully in a deposition in connection with a case then pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 15 Civ. 7344, knowingly made false material declarations, to wit, MAXWELL gave the following underlined false testimony: Q.

as if fully set forth within. 11 EFTA00011003 --- PAGE BREAK --- 13. From at least in or about 1994, up to and including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, knowingly did persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual to travel in interstate and fore

f 10 Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 2 BACKGROUND A. Overview On July 2, 2019, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a sealed indictment (the "Indictment") charging the defendant with one count of sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 159

jurisdiction of his choosing (Le., the one to which he chose to flee). See, e.g., United States v. Morrison, No. 16-MR-118, 2016 WL 7421924, at *4 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2016); United States v. Kazeem, No. 15 Cr. 172, 2015 WL 4645357, at *3 (D. Or. Aug. 3, 2015); United States v. Young, Nos. 12 Cr. 502, 12

on and Pen Register Information APPLICATION Mag. The United States of America, by its attorney, Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, respectfully requests that the Court issue the accompanying proposed Warrants and Orders for prospe

falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re Order, 632 F. Supp. 2d 202, 207 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Application, 405 F. Supp. 2d 435, 444-45 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). But see In re Application, 849 F. Supp. 2d 526, 574 (D.Md. 2011) (rejecting

rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights were expansive and could apply before charges were filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least

esented the case to the U.S. Attomey’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel

ights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights ® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in t

sented the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel

rorist activities and to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. See Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d at 647-48; see also Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410, 428-29 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (finding that plaintiffs had “sufficiently pled that the defendant consciously disregarded the fact that it was supporting a terrorist organiza

r claims against these financial sponsors of terrorism. Statement Of Subject Matter and Appellate Jurisdiction The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had subject matter jurisdiction over these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1330, 1331, 1332, 1350, 1367, 1407, and 1605, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964 and 2338,

ional. by Jesse Eisinger ProPublica, March 12, 2017, 6:22 p.m. 1 Comment Print Print search Follow ProPublica reet Bharara, then U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, at Trump Tower in November 2016 (Drew Angerer/Getty Images) After his election in 1968, President Richard Nixon asked Robert Morgenthau, the US Att

l attitude to the world of business. He pioneered the Southern District’s approach to corporate crime. When his prosecutors

eclare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed in the State of New York and admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Iam a member of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., counsel of record for Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in this action. I respectfully submit

rs, the same standard governs the addition of parties under Rule 21 and Rule 15. See Goston v. Potter, No. 08-cv-478 FJS ATB, 2010 WL 4774238, at *5 (N.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal Music Grp., Inc., 248 F.R.D. 408, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)). 4 GIUFFRE002847 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014680

fficking of underage girls. The case — which was settled in 2017 — involved Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who sued Ghislaine Maxwell in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. Giuffre has asserted that Maxwell and Epstein trafficked her and other underage girls, often at sex parties that Epstein hosted at his homes

rts Giuffre, who sued Maxwell in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. Giufire has asserted that Ma

HERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TO: GREETINGS: WE COMMAND YOU that all and singular business and excuses being laid aside, you appear and attend before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern District of New York, at the following date, time and pl

iminal penalties, in addition to other penalties of the Law. DATED: New York, New York May 12, 2021 /s AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, Telephone: rev. 02.01.12 EFTA00014663

ew York, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the defendant, having taken an oath to testify truthfully in a deposition in connection with a case then pending before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under docket number 15 Civ. 7344, knowingly made false material declarations, to wit, MAXWELL gave the following underlined false testimony: Q.

ed by counsel in multiple ongoing civil lawsuits in the United States. As recently as in or about June 2020, attorney Laura Menninger appeared in in the Southern District of New York for oral argument before United States District Judge Loretta A. Preska on MAXWELL's behalf. 13. Based on my review of AT&T records, I have learne