10
Total Mentions
10
Documents
103
Connected Entities
Zarger appears exclusively as a legal precedent in bail hearings, with the case *United States v. Zarger* cited 10 times across documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's bail proceedings to argue against home detention.
All 10 mentions of Zarger are high-signal legal citations in court filings, specifically referencing *United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364* (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000). The case is used repeatedly to support the argument that electronic monitoring only 'merely reduce[s] a head start' for a fleeing defendant and is insufficient for bail denial. These citations appear in documents from 2019 proceedings involving Epstein's bail applications.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Honorable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 8 merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant’s application for bail in part because home detent
observed, "home detention with electronic monitoring does not prevent flight; at best, it limits a fleeing defendant's head start." United States v. Zarger, No. 00- CR-773-S-1 (JG), 2000 WL 1134364, at *I (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000). Furthermore, while the Defendant now represents that she would be released
Page: EFTA00013325 →At best, home confinement and electronic monitoring would reduce his head start should he decide to cut the bracelet and flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with ele
Page: EFTA00015539 →ing device. At best, home confinement with electronic monitoring would merely reduce her head start should she decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 8 EFTA00018513 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 10 of 10 (E.D.N
Page: EFTA00018514 →rable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 8 merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home dete
Page: EFTA00024591 →as required. At best, home confinement with electronic monitoring would merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home dete
Page: EFTA00028304 →At best, home confinement and electronic monitoring would reduce his head start should he decide to cut the bracelet and flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home detention with ele
Page: EFTA00028792 →rable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 8 merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home dete
Page: EFTA00029011 →been removed. At best, home confinement and electronic monitoring would merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home dete
Page: EFTA00030252 →rable Henry Pitman United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2019 Page 8 merely reduce his head start should he decide to flee. See United States v. Zarger, No. 00 Cr. 773, 2000 WL 1134364, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2000) (Gleeson, J.) (rejecting defendant's application for bail in part because home dete
Page: EFTA00030839 →Second Circuit
OrganizationDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
N.D. Cal.
LocationCasteneda
PersonBenatar
Person
Anderson
PersonBrazilian association football player (born 1988)
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)

Reid Weingarten
PersonTown in the valley of the Schussen River, in the district of Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Gleeson
PersonPitman
Person
Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
Laskow
Person
Contreras
Person
Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Ferranti
Person
U.S. Virgin Islands
LocationUnincorporated territory of the United States of America
Martir
Person
New York State
Location
Icarus
Person