Back to People & Entities
LA
LaFontaine
Person
38
Total Mentions
38
Documents
247
Connected Entities
Surname reference in Epstein-related documents
The mentions of "LaFontaine" in the documents primarily relate to a legal citation, *United States v. LaFontaine*, 210 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2000), regarding the government's ability to present evidence by proffer in detention hearings. There is also a general listing of names that appear in the documents.
LaFontaine appears in legal citations within several documents, referencing a case regarding the admissibility of evidence by proffer in detention hearings. The case *United States v. LaFontaine* is cited as precedent in the Second Circuit. LaFontaine is also listed as a name appearing in the documents, without further context.
Key Highlights
- •The primary connection to the documents is through a legal citation: *United States v. LaFontaine*, 210 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2000).
- •The citation relates to the government's right to present evidence by proffer in detention hearings.
- •LaFontaine is also listed as one of the names that appear in the documents.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (20 of 38)
1 mention
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Page: EFTA00015549 →1 mention
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
Page: EFTA00018509 →1 mention
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Page: EFTA00024587 →Sponsored
1 mention
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Page: EFTA00028300 →1 mention
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Page: EFTA00029007 →1 mention
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Page: EFTA00030835 →Sponsored
1 mention
It is well established in this circuit that proffers are permissible both in the bail determination and bail revocation contexts." United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 131 (2d Cir. 2000). Before making its prior bail determinations, the Court scrutinized, among the other relevant factors, the Governm
Page: EFTA00032768 →EFTA00039383.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00039383
ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou
EFTA00058445.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00058445
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Sponsored
EFTA00066191.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00066191
d States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering ... [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. [6,7] To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no condi
EFTA00066307.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00066307
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
EFTA00068050.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00068050
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Sponsored
EFTA00071674.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00071674
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
EFTA00073990.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00073990
ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou
EFTA00074029.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00074029
ed States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering .. . [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no conditions cou
Sponsored
EFTA00076303.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076303
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
EFTA00076331.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076331
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
EFTA00076815.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076815
d States v. Chimurenga, 760 F.2d 400, 403 (2d Cir. 1985). "[E]ven a single incident of witness tampering ... [may be] sufficient to revoke bail." LaFontaine, 210 F.3d at 134. [6,7] To order detention based upon risk of flight, the Court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that "that no condi
Sponsored
EFTA00078231.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00078231
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
EFTA00080486.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00080486
rings and the government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United Stat
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 247)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
37 docs37 co-mentions
Michael Jackson
PersonAmerican singer, songwriter, record producer, and dancer (1958–2009)
37 docs37 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
33 docs33 co-mentions
Ferranti
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
31 docs31 co-mentions
CA
Casteneda
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
31 docs31 co-mentions
GL
Gleeson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
31 docs31 co-mentions
Anderson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
31 docs31 co-mentions
Southern District of New York
OrganizationFederal judicial district covering Manhattan and surrounding areas
31 docs31 co-mentions
New York State
LocationState in the northeastern United States
30 docs30 co-mentions
Contreras
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
30 docs30 co-mentions
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City
30 docs30 co-mentions
U.S. Virgin Islands
LocationUnincorporated territory of the United States of America
29 docs29 co-mentions
Amber Southerland
PersonPerson referenced in documents
28 docs28 co-mentions
MW
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
27 docs27 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
26 docs26 co-mentions
Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
26 docs26 co-mentions
Mercedes-Benz
OrganizationGerman automobile brand owned by Mercedes-Benz AG
24 docs24 co-mentions
N.Y. Post
OrganizationFinancial services company
24 docs24 co-mentions
LA
Laskow
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
24 docs24 co-mentions
AN
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
24 docs24 co-mentions