Back to People & Entities
LA
Laskow
Person
35
Total Mentions
35
Documents
565
Connected Entities
Surname reference in Epstein-related documents
Document Mentions (20 of 35)
1 mention
leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. g This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00015544 →1 mention
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00024589 →1 mention
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00028302 →Sponsored
1 mention
leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. g This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00028797 →1 mention
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00029009 →1 mention
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Page: EFTA00030837 →Sponsored
EFTA00058455.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00058455
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00058445.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00058445
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00065989.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00065989
ted States v. Gonzalez, 93 F. App'x 268 (2d Cir. 2004) 14, 22, 27, 29 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1986) 24 United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 867 F.2d 1425 (2d Cir. 1988) 21 United States v. Marquez, 909 F.2d 738 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S
Sponsored
EFTA00068050.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00068050
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00071674.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00071674
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00076303.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076303
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Sponsored
EFTA00076331.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076331
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00076359.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00076359
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00078231.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00078231
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Sponsored
EFTA00080486.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00080486
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00089393.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00089393
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00092041.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092041
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Sponsored
EFTA00092030.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092030
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
EFTA00096142.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00096142
purports to bind "the Government." See Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 565)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
35 docs35 co-mentions
AN
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
35 docs35 co-mentions
Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)
32 docs32 co-mentions
MW
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
32 docs32 co-mentions
Michael Jackson
PersonAmerican singer, songwriter, record producer, and dancer (1958–2009)
32 docs32 co-mentions
Anderson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
32 docs32 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
32 docs32 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
32 docs32 co-mentions
Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement
30 docs30 co-mentions
PR
Prisco
PersonSurname reference in documents
28 docs28 co-mentions
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City
28 docs28 co-mentions
Southern District of New York
OrganizationFederal judicial district covering Manhattan and surrounding areas
28 docs28 co-mentions
N.Y. Post
OrganizationFinancial services company
27 docs27 co-mentions
CA
Casteneda
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
27 docs27 co-mentions
PI
Pitman
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
27 docs27 co-mentions
Icarus
PersonMythological figure or literary reference (not a real person in documents)
27 docs27 co-mentions
Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
27 docs27 co-mentions
Amber Southerland
PersonPerson referenced in documents
27 docs27 co-mentions
New York State
LocationState in the northeastern United States
26 docs26 co-mentions
Richard M. Berman
PersonAmerican judge
26 docs26 co-mentions