10
Total Mentions
9
Documents
89
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
Benatar appears in the documents exclusively as a legal precedent cited in bail and flight risk arguments, with no direct connection to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
All 10 mentions of Benatar are identical legal citations from the case 'United States v. Benatar' (2002), used in bail motion arguments. The citations appear in multiple documents (EFTA00015532, EFTA00018505, etc.) discussing flight risk and electronic monitoring, but Benatar is never discussed as a person or party of interest in the Epstein investigation.
Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). 5. Private Security is Inadequate, Unfair, and Impractical Here The defe
Page: EFTA00015539 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00015553 →ation for bail in part because home detention with electronic monitoring "at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant's head start"); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same); see also United States v. Casteneda, No. 18 Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9
Page: EFTA00018514 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00024591 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00028304 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). 5. Private Security is Inadequate, Unfair, and Impractical Here The defe
Page: EFTA00028792 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00029011 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). D. Private Security is Inadequate and Raises Numerous Questions and Chall
Page: EFTA00030252 →Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00030839 →EFTA01655417
09/03, Sanderson), Cincinnati.com (09/03, Ferrara), WKRC (CBS-12) (09/03, Winter), WDTN (CBS-13) (09/03, Brown, Singh, et al.), WCMH (NBC-4) (09/03, Benatar), and WHIO (CBS-7) (09/03, Staff Writer). Back to Top COUNTERTERRORISM Feds Intercept 1,300 Barrels of Meth Precursor Chemicals Shipped From Chin

Michael Jackson
PersonAmerican singer, songwriter, record producer, and dancer (1958–2009)

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
District Court for the Southern District of New York
OrganizationU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Anderson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
Second Circuit
OrganizationU.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Casteneda
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Zarger
PersonSurname reference in documents

Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
Pitman
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents

Richard M. Berman
PersonAmerican judge

New York State
LocationState in the northeastern United States

Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
Gleeson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Ferranti
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Amber Southerland
PersonPerson referenced in documents

Icarus
PersonMythological figure or literary reference (not a real person in documents)
LaFontaine
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
The Fantasist
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents
Laskow
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents