Back to Network
11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
Document Mentions (11 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.3d at 54. Otherwise, the statute applies to past conduct unless doing so would create impermissible retroactive effects. Id. The Court begins with Landgraf s first step. To assess a statute's meaning here, courts must consider the text of the statute along with other indicia of congressional intent, inc
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Landgraf and Casamento
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON31 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
United States
LOCATION29 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
USI Film Products
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON22 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION21 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Reid Weingarten
PERSON21 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
FBI
ORGANIZATION21 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Eric Holder
PERSON20 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Leahy
PERSON20 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Bridges
PERSON20 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
SC
Schneider
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Napolitano
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
AN
Annabi
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
SA
Salameh
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
JO
Josephberg
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
Vernon
PERSON19 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
SA
Santobello
PERSON18 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento
NE
Nejad
PERSON18 w/ Landgraf·11 w/ Casamento