Back to People & Entities
Casamento
Location
11
Total Mentions
11
Documents
82
Connected Entities
Location referenced in documents
Document Mentions (11)
EFTA00085225.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00085225
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00090494.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00090494
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00092755.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092755
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
EFTA00092886.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092886
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00103273.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103273
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00103343.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103343
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
EFTA00103308.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103308
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00103238.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103238
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00104652.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00104652
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
EFTA00105663.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00105663
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
EFTA00154640.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00154640
The balance of these considerations favors severance. "Motions to sever are committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1149 (2d Cir. 1989). In its discretion, the Court concludes that trying the perjury counts separately will best ensure a fair and e
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 82)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
11 docs11 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
11 docs11 co-mentions
Adriana Ross
PersonPolish former model and Epstein associate, named as unindicted co-conspirator in 2007 plea deal, invoked Fifth Amendment in depositions
11 docs11 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
11 docs11 co-mentions
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States
11 docs11 co-mentions
Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015
11 docs11 co-mentions
Murray
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple Murrays including Murray J. McCabe and Murray Gell-Mann in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Alberto Gonzales
Person80th United States Attorney General
11 docs11 co-mentions
Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
11 docs11 co-mentions
CO
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
SC
Schneider
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
WA
Walker
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
RU
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
TH
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
JE
Jeffries
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
11 docs11 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
11 docs11 co-mentions
CU
Cunningham
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions