ocation of Fifth Amendment by sister of civil defendant in absence of “identity of interests”); Sebastian v. City of Chicago, 2008 WL 2875255 *33-34 (N.D. Ill. 2008)(no adverse inference from invocation of Fifth Amendment in absence of close family or business relationship). Similarly, any other witnesses ta

(2006) ..o.c.ccccccccccceeseseseesetenseseeeeseeesesenecsenssenenseeeeeeeerenes 36 Geraty v. Vill. of Antioch, No. 09 C 6992, 2015 WL 127917, at *7 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 8, 2015) ......... 9 Gordy Co. v. Mary Jane Girls, Inc., No. 86 CIV. 6814 (RWS), 1989 WL 28477, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 1989) oo. cccccccccese

her than afforded some alternate means of communicating her views") (emphasis in original), with United States v. Marcello, 370 F. Supp. 2d 745, 749 (N.D. Ill. 2005) (holding that "in detention hearings, the victim's right to be reasonably heard does not mandate oral statements, particularly when the [victim