eserved. 4 Documents 1 Docurnents; 3 Docurtients 6/9/2008 EFTA00007122 --- PAGE BREAK --- U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Fax) March 14, 2008 eraBureau of Investigation New York, NY Dear Ms. Your name has been reported to the United States District Court for the So

eserved. 4 Documents 1 Docurnents; 3 Docurtients 6/9/2008 EFTA00007122 --- PAGE BREAK --- U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Fax) March 14, 2008 eraBureau of Investigation New York, NY Dear Ms. Your name has been reported to the United States District Court for the So

eserved. 4 Documents 1 Docurnents; 3 Docurtients 6/9/2008 EFTA00007122 --- PAGE BREAK --- U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Fax) March 14, 2008 eraBureau of Investigation New York, NY Dear Ms. Your name has been reported to the United States District Court for the So

MS. 15 Q All right. Thank you. Mr. Acosta, OPR is 16 investigating two things. As you know, one, whether one or 17 more federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida 18 U.S. Attorney's Office may have committed professional 19 misconduct by entering into the non-prosecution agreement, or 20 NPA, in 2007 with

MS. 15 Q All right. Thank you. Mr. Acosta, OPR is 16 investigating two things. As you know, one, whether one or 17 more federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida 18 U.S. Attorney's Office may have committed professional 19 misconduct by entering into the non-prosecution agreement, or 20 NPA, in 2007 with

MS. 15 Q All right. Thank you. Mr. Acosta, OPR is 16 investigating two things. As you know, one, whether one or 17 more federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida 18 U.S. Attorney's Office may have committed professional 19 misconduct by entering into the non-prosecution agreement, or 20 NPA, in 2007 with

xander Acosta | a Aftermath Former U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010553 --- PAGE BREAK --- | CH

xander Acosta | a Aftermath Former U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010553 --- PAGE BREAK --- | CH

us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submissions that will

ted because no federal charges were ever filed in the Southern District of Florida,” Valle said. “Because the matter remains pending

tims across state lines and other associated crimes. The federal non-prosecution agreement Epstein's legal team negotiated with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida immunized all named and unnamed "potential co-conspirators" in Epstein's child trafficking network, which includes those who allegedly procured minor

e 12 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013330 --- PAGE BREAK --- discussions, on September 24, 2007, Epstein signed an agreement with the U.S. Attomney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. Under the agreement, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to an indictment pending against him in the 15" Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County ch

ife to helping victims of sex trafficking. 26. On December 30, 2014, Giuffre moved to join the on-going litigation previously filed by Jane Doe 1 in the Southern District of Florida challenging Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement by filing her own joinder motion. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015535 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-cv-07433 Do

y avoidable procedural dispute. Counsel for the Post has contacted the Palm Beach State Attorney’s office and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida (collectively, the “Florida Prosecutors”) to apprise them of its intention to refile this motion to unseal the appellate briefs with the names of vic

tims across state lines and other associated crimes. The federal non-prosecution agreement Epstein’s legal team negotiated with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida immunized all named and unnamed "potential co-conspirators" in Epstein's child trafficking network, which includes those who allegedly procured minor

alm Beach to “other places in the U.S. [including the Southern District of New York] and abroad and brought them to Epstein’

knowledge, two of his victims filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Flor- ida in 2008, claiming that prosecutors violated th

KAM Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 4 of 5 - 5 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S.

Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 wh

al Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests

tims across state lines and other associated crimes. The federal non-prosecution agreement Epstein's legal team negotiated with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida immunized all named and unnamed "potential co-conspirators" in Epstein's child trafficking network, which includes those who allegedly procured minor

www.hermanlaw.com - 4 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected]

all pertain to the negotiation and eventual entering into of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Southern District of Florida. See part I above herein. Again, the constitutional issues raised in Defendant's response permeate these discovery requests. The full text of Feder

KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 4 of 5 - 5 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S.

us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submissions that will