see also Felder v. McCotter, 765 F.2d 1245, 1248 (Sth Cir. 1985) (citing Texas law). 178 Alvarado, 440 F.3d

..3 Zamora v. GC Servs., L.P., 647 F. App’x 330 (Sth Cir. 2016)... cccececeeeeeeeceneeneenseeseeeeeneenes 9

n re Kenna, 453 F.3d 1136, 1137 (9th Cir. 2006) (looking to legislative history to interpret CVRA); United States v. Cienfuegos, 462 F.3d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2006) (same); United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 2d 1341, 1344 (D. Utah 2006) (same); United States v. Ingrassia, 2005 WE 2875220 (E.D.N_Y. 20

nd, 380 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 1279 (ND. Ala. 2005). 98 See 28 U.S.C. 2072(b) (2000). % See, e.g., Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2002). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017724 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 11 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, #853 While this argument 1s legally precise,

he Fifth Amendment privilege is designed to protect from compelled disclosure. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Dated Apr. 18, 2003, 383 F.3d 905, 911 (9th Cir. 2004) (finding an act of production to be testimonial in nature where a "subpoena seeks all documents within a category but fails to describe those d