see also Felder v. McCotter, 765 F.2d 1245, 1248 (Sth Cir. 1985) (citing Texas law). 178 Alvarado, 440 F.3d

..3 Zamora v. GC Servs., L.P., 647 F. App’x 330 (Sth Cir. 2016)... cccececeeeeeeeceneeneenseeseeeeeneenes 9

n re Kenna, 453 F.3d 1136, 1137 (9th Cir. 2006) (looking to legislative history to interpret CVRA); United States v. Cienfuegos, 462 F.3d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir. 2006) (same); United States v. Degenhardt, 405 F. Supp. 2d 1341, 1344 (D. Utah 2006) (same); United States v. Ingrassia, 2005 WE 2875220 (E.D.N_Y. 20

nd, 380 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 1279 (ND. Ala. 2005). 98 See 28 U.S.C. 2072(b) (2000). % See, e.g., Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2002). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017724 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 11 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, #853 While this argument 1s legally precise,

he Fifth Amendment privilege is designed to protect from compelled disclosure. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Dated Apr. 18, 2003, 383 F.3d 905, 911 (9th Cir. 2004) (finding an act of production to be testimonial in nature where a "subpoena seeks all documents within a category but fails to describe those d

y, United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128, 100 S.Ct. 948, 956, 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)). See also, United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980)(Information is protected by the privilege not only if it would support a crimi

03/25/2009 Page 10 of 15 Page 10 U.S. 115, 128, 100 S.Ct. 948, 956, 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)). See also, United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980)(1nformation is protected by the privilege not only if it would support a crimina

t was timely as of the date of the amendment, to any time during the lifetime of the minor victim. See United States v. Chief 438 F.3d 920, 922-25 (9th Cir. 2006) (finding that because Congress extended the statute of limitations for sex offenses involving minors during the time the previous statute was

ate.” United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). The Fifth

n]" United States v., Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 825 (1980). Brief Concl

ate.” United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). The Fifth

f 23 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 4 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. Unite

" See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. Unit

ate.” United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). The Fifth

"the responses would merely 'provide a lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover, the a

where “the responses would merely ‘provide a lead or clue’ to evidence having a tendency to incriminate.” United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). The Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination comes into play only in those instances where the w

w be incriminating himself.” Omnibus Order at 8. The magistrate judge cited as supporting authority In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 383 F.3d 905, 910 (9th Cir. 2004) (noting there can be no self-incrimination by production where the ‘existence and location of the documents . .. are a ‘foregone conclusion’

"the responses would merely 'provide a lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover, the a

"the responses would merely 'provide a lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491, 494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Add new case fr

ly concerned with procuring apologies to make morally right a legal wrong done to the plaintiff. Id. (quoting McKee v. Turner, 491 F.2d 1106, 1107 (9th Cir. 1974)). And certainly, a court may not order a defendant to speak in a manner that may contravene the beliefs the defendant holds. See id.; see als