Epstein Secrets

1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

al., 5 Plaintiffs, I JUNE 12, 2009 6 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 9 10 7 8 11 12 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: 14 15 16 ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 18205 Biscayne Bou

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (1 I th Cir. 2006); United States. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States'. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004)

l. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC v. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefi

ismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United State

1996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC I Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

1996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC I Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).