should reject the PSI's conclusion that the four counts of conviction should be grouped together pursuant to § 3D1.2(c) and should instead compute Jenne's advisory guideline sentence in accordance with the joint recommendation contained in the parties' plea agreement. As a result, this Court should c

rules in the manner contemplated by the parties' plea agreement and, thereby, to arrive at the proper advisory sentencing range of 18 to 24 months. Jenne's defense attorney, J. David Bogenschutz, has advised the undersigned Assistant United States Attorneys that he has no objection to this request.

imate things for the law firm, and hiring former Jaw enforcement was the best way to do that. ] was hoping to actually ultimately create a group. Ken Jenne and I had talked about that extensively. Q. Why did you hire Ken Jenne? A. Prior to Ken going to prison, he and ] were Page 32 very friendly and h

stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz v. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 *1 (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cook

endment right against compelled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz v. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 *1 (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). “However, ‘the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcom

ng desperate. The opposition persists - and after Sunday's crude assault, it may grow." Iran Nuclear Talks Resume In Vienna. The AP (5/25, Rising, Jenne) reports that on Tuesday, "World powers opened a fifth round of talks with Iran aimed at bringing the United States back into the landmark 2015 nucl

The opposition persists - and after Sunday's crude assault, it may grow." EFTA00161583 Iran Nuclear Talks Resume In Vienna. The AP (5/25, Rising, Jenne) reports that on Tuesday, "World powers opened a fifth round of talks with Iran aimed at bringing the United States back into the landmark 2015 nucl

any ia snots otl•er than ILBSf nernal Snit«. Øen akhough LIM Fared Stokes genera ezdates Ow nternaten es el ea mend the firm does rot von* any Jenne, the the 'Scanner, ~Cat ban" sd •Urreaked gait loss' o *mere as ot the due d the suomare. At such. Please do not rayon tut etimilot »mat/ warner

ies in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROTHSTEIN in making these offers by providing confidential, privileged and work- prod

frey Epstein Date: July 25, 2016 at 12:26:49 PM EDT To: Richard Kahn < >, "Dowling, David" < Cc: Lesle Groff < >, Larry Visoski < >, "Giacomo, Jenne" < >, ifly Heliflite Scheduling & Dispatch < [email protected] > Hello Richard, Would you be able to send us the coordinates or a Google Earth p

inent (Clinton, Trump, Dershowitz, etc.) 19.17 Were you aware of investors coming in and looking at Epstein files? 19.18 ever meet any? 19.19 Did Jenne or Fisten tell you they brought in files? 19.20 know Michael Legamaro? Hear of him? Who is he? 20. Does he know a 20.1 If so, did he ever talk t

e 14-16; and Same objection as well as attorney-client privilege and instruct you not to answer. 198/21-23] Q: Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? Id. at page 201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line

e judged by the facts that existed at the time of the defendant's arrest, not evidence subsequently learned or provided to the prosecution. Madly v. Jenne, 867 So. 2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("Probable cause is judged by the facts and legal state of affairs that existed at the time of the arres

ies in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROTHSTEIN in making these offers by providing confidential, privileged and work- prod

ein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reported to conduct their investigations of Epstein. 15. In October 2009, on o

r working on 10 the Epstein investigation? 11 A. Not that I'm aware of. 12 Q. Did he ever tell you that he had any 13 communications with Mr. Jenne, or Mr. Fandrey or 14 Mr. Fisten? 15 A. Not that fin aware of. 16 Q. And have you ever seen any note, report, 17 document, memorandum, e-mail

ies in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROTHSTEIN in making these offers by providing confidential, privileged and work- prod

ion on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. 201/3-6 201/19-24 201/25 202/4-11 Q. Did you ever authorize or direct Mr. Jenne to perform any investigation on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. If you're unaware of the existence of the entity

. sPoncroe and Pmlerilmoge emwtes Mr. EPSten exercised no administrators oNsahosal. intaial a malarial cored ova ct aro d such inter ret axons • us/Jenne it kinet accounts below by such service previderS t been partenently 6 =crewed and all dine accounts have teen dosed a deleted. Mr. Epstein is not

e judged by the facts that existed at the time of the defendant's arrest, not evidence subsequently learned or provided to the prosecution. Madly v. Jenne, 867 So. 2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) ("Probable cause is judged by the facts and legal state of affairs that 14 EFTA00583965 existed at th

team of investigators on the Epstein Actions, including Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and former Broward County Sheriff and convicted felon Ken Jenne ("Jenne"). 12. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards, and routinely reported to Edwards and Rothstein regarding their invest