ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir

, Plaintiffs submit that the Court's exercise of this discretionary power is appropriate to transfer all corporate power over the firm to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt to effect the dissolution request in Count 1, to perform au accounting of the firm's assets and liabilities, to undertake all actions necessary to u

ividually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir

ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir

vidually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott ROthateirtalded by.other lawyerS and employees:at the firth of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler,. P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, In betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties' o their 6wn debts and professional dbli

ship which, at all times relevant hereto, served as the auditing firm for BIF and Banyon 1030-32 and as the accounting firm for RRA, Rothstein, and Rosenfeldt individually. As described, Berenfeld was uniquely positioned as Banyon auditor and RRA accountant to discover the fraudulent scheme and, despite co

he produce current account statements. Eventually, Stay relented and began inconsolably crying, repeating the phrase, "I don't want to go to jail." Rosenfeldt proceeded to telephone Spinosa, who initially declined to provide account balance verification. After much cajoling, Spinosa finally informed Rosen

25 the standard questions. I answered them. The rest you United Reporting, Inc. (954) 525- 2221 EFTA00314954 Page 2261 1 could meet with Mr. Rosenfeldt as did other investors, 2 and my recollection is he was referring to Mr. Scherer's 3 clients. I don't know if that ever - if I actually let 4 M

1 Q Okay. From TD Bank. 2 Is this e-mail purporting to send what purports 3 to be a $64 million balance in an account at Rosenstein 4 (sic,) Rosenfeldt, Adler escrow account? 5 A Can you ask the question again, please? I'm 6 sorry. 7 (The pending question was read back by the 8 court reporte

ividually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir

1 Q Okay. From TD Bank. 2 Is this e-mail purporting to send what purports 3 to be a $64 million balance in an account at Rosenstein 4 (sic,) Rosenfeldt, Adler escrow account? 5 A Can you ask the question again, please? I'm 6 sorry. 7 (The pending question was read back by the 8 court reporte

questions. I answered them. The rest you United Reporting, Inc. (954) 525- 2221 EFTA_R1_00015713 EFTA01735053 Page 2261 1 could meet with Mr. Rosenfeldt as did other investors, 2 and my recollection is he was referring to Mr. Scherer's 3 clients. I don't know if that ever - if I actually let 4 M

the main individual who advised those assembled in 7 the room that that's what was going to occur? 8 A. I don't remember. 9 Q. Was it -- did Rosenfeldt speak at all at 10 that meeting? 11 A. I, I can't remember. 1.2 Q. Do you remember the date of the meeting? 13 A. I remember that it was a

18 BY MR. CRITTON: 19 Q. Okay. I'll remember that. With regard 20 to, so as to whether or not Mr. Rothstein could have 21 accessed it or Mr. Rosenfeldt or anyone else who was 22 not an invitee at least from your knowledge, you 23 believe they cannot access it? l4 A. Correct. Q. Can you as we

ividually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir

:1 s/Larry 44:20 21:12 31:18,19 role 25:13 37:7 shape 11:4 9:24 10:6 1311 34:4 36:3 37:2 Room 2:23 shield 29:1 14:8,17 16:7 19:14 T 38:21 Rosenfeldt 1:17 show 36:22 42:11 22:10,19 29:9 39:4 T44:17,17 times 17:19 18:2 rose-colored 11:16 Sid 3:10 44:5,22 take 7:12 9:12 10:3,3 today 8:4 13:11

gment Motion, I believed at the time of filing my original Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler ("RRA"), engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm (the "Ponzi Scheme

rom Storage June 13, 2013) CMA vs. JEE and Correspondence Summons and Complaint EE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeldt vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case # 6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case # 80656 C

set forth in a Civil Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit ar attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A., deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, a

s allegedly taken by Epstein. In fact, this litigation with Epstein catapulted Edwards from an unknown solo practitioner to a partner at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, Edwards still utilizes his litigious association with Mr. Epstein at his new firm Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehr

ividually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obl

ered appointing Stettin as the CRO of RRA and delegating to him all operational and managerial control over RRA. This Resolution effectively removed Rosenfeldt from all managerial roles at RRA, and to the extent Edwards had any managerial roles, 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FILE CABINET ONE DRAWER ONE: CMA vs. JEE Correspondence Summons and Complaint JEE Summons and Complaint Motion, Notice and Order of Dismissal Rosenfeldt vs. Rothstein Doe 1 Case # 6596 Doe II Case # 20614 Document Production Doe II Case # 20614 Jane Doe 8 Case # 80802 Jane Doe 102 Case ft 80656

day, is the inappropriate deposition. And I know we've got a bunch of people here. So as the Court probably has read in the media, the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler, PA, law Page 5 1 police officers and sheriffs officers to go out 2 and to investigate and get, so to speak, the dirt. 3 We know tha

s allegedly taken by Epstein. In fact, this litigation with Epstein catapulted Edwards from an unknown solo practitioner to a partner at Rothstein. Rosenfeldt, Adler. Moreover, Edwards still utilizes his litigious association with Mr. Epstein at his new firm Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, & Lehr

g United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Miami, Florida 33132 Attention: Re: Subpocna to Brad Edwards, Esq., Law Finn of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler Dear Mr. Sloman: Assistant United States Attorney I received your request to issue the above-referenced subpoena related to Operation Sto