95-98 (3d Cir. 2006); United States v. Walker, 447 F.3d 999, 1006-07 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. Egenberger, 424 F.3d 803, 805 (Sth Cir. 2005). The First Circuit has held only that the failure to provide notice does not constitute plain error. See United States v. Mateo, No. 06-1805, 2006 WL 1195676, at 1 (1st

F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a st

o obtain the “extraordinary” remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat’l Bank, 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay “is highly nuanced . . . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situ

investment on behalf of a Chinese energy giant. Read full article » PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1st Circ. Focuses On Extortion Benefit In Boston Aides' Case The First Circuit on Tuesday peppered attorneys for both the government and a pair of Boston City Hall aides on whether prosecutors need to show that someone accused

new when they bribed doctors to prescribe opioids that some of the powerful drugs would go to people who didn't need them, federal prosecutors told the First Circuit in a bid to reinstate part of a landmark guilty verdict. Brief attached I Read full article » NJ Judge Won't Toss Health Plan Enrollment Fraud Cla

s have also recognized the principle that the filing of a document gives rise to a presumptive right of public access"). Amodeo 1, 44 F.3d at 145. The First Circuit "has taken a somewhat different approach," id. In that circuit "documents must have a role in the adjudication process in order to be accessible and

rs in the Gulf of Mexico to dump wastewater. Read full article » HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES 1st Circ. Perplexed By 'Odd' Trump Birth Control Argument The First Circuit on Wednesday appeared to lean toward reviving Massachusetts' challenge to a Trump administration rule allowing exemptions to birth control coverage

s has clearly manifested its intent to the contrary." Gentile, 235 F. Supp. 2d at 654 (quoting Hughes, 520 U.S. at 946 (emphasis added by court)).5 The First Circuit, addressing the issue on an ineffective assistance of counsel of claim (and thus not reaching a merits decision), issued a similar caution in the sp

during a bridge restoration project. Brief attached I Read full article >> APPELLATE 1st Circ. OKs Hefty Prison Term For Lottery, Emerald Hoaxes The First Circuit on Tuesday upheld the conviction and 13-year prison sentence for an Ohio man who sweet-talked victims into parting with their retirement savings an

ife, the company's general counsel, despite newly unearthed documents and witnesses that he says show there was public news of the imminent merger, the First Circuit has ruled. Opinion attached I Read full article » DOJ, Mine Investors Say Och-Ziff Unit Can't Duck Restitution At the court's beckoning, the U.S.

rder requiring disclosure to the Providence Journal of various documents reflecting the results of an unauthorized and illegal wiretap. Id. at 889. The First Circuit explained that litigants are entitled to meaningful appellate review, which demands the opportunity for the appellate court to "take a fresh look a

a plea or sentence only if . . (B) the victim petitions the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus within 14 days . . ." 18 U.S.C. § 377I(d)(5). The First Circuit addressed how the conflict between the rights of victims and defendants is exacerbated by the passage of time in United States I Aguirre-Gonzalez ,

plea or sentence only if . . . (B) the victim petitions the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus within 14 days . . ." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(5). The First Circuit addressed how the conflict between the rights of victims and defendants is exacerbated by the passage of time in United States v. Aguirre-Gonzalez ,

the entrails of a goat, we are left to scour the record for indications of what these documents might be and what they might contain. Id. at 569. The First Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of the litigants' motion to quash because of their failure "to present sufficient information with respect to t

o obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat? Bank ,175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced . . . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situ

obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat'l Bank, 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced .. . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situa

obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat? Bank , 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced . . . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situ

obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat'l Bank, 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced .. . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situa

obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat? Bank , 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced . . . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situ

obtain the "extraordinary" remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced. Sterling Nat? Bank , 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted). The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay "is highly nuanced . . . [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situ