in relation to the government's response to the court's summary judgment order and proposed remedies in Jane Doe v. United Stales, No. 08-cv-80736 (S.D. Fl.); 7. Information provided by alleged victims (or their counsel) related to Mr. Epstein prior to the return of the above-captioned Indictment; Ple

in relation to the government's response to the court's summary judgment order and proposed remedies in Jane Doe v. United Stales, No. 08-cv-80736 (S.D. Fl.); 7. Information provided by alleged victims (or their counsel) related to Mr. Epstein prior to the return of the above-captioned Indictment; Ple

in relation to the government's response to the court's summary judgment order and proposed remedies in Jane Doe v. United Stales, No. 08-cv-80736 (S.D. Fl.); 7. Information provided by alleged victims (or their counsel) related to Mr. Epstein prior to the return of the above-captioned Indictment; Ple

s issue, or if Ms. selects another attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

his issue, or if you select another attorney to represent you, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

he United States respectfully requests that, consistent with the guidelines enunciated in 18 U.S.C. § 2705(6) and the Court's equitable powers under S.D. Fl. Gen. R. 5.4(B), the Motion for Order of Disclosure under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 and the Order of Disclosure be sealed until the time for production of d

d sealing is appropriate in connection with grand jury proceedings. As explained by Judge Jordan in United States v. Steinger, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops North

sealing is appropriate in connection with grand jury proceedings. As explained by Judge Jordan in United States I Steinger , 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. I Petrol Stops Northw

sealing is appropriate in connection with grand jury proceedings. As explained by Judge Jordan in United States v. Steinger , 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops North

an attorney does not render everything he does for or with the client privileged." Gutter v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. , 1998 WL 2017926, *1 (S.D. Fl. May 18, 1998) EFTA00211785 (citations omitted). If an attorney (or his agent) was doing something other than rendering legal advice, neither the

sealing is appropriate in connection with grand jury proceedings. As explained by Judge Jordan in United States I Steinger , 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009), "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. I Petrol Stops Northw

lled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz v. Jenne , 2007 WL 624286 *1 (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). "However, `the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of related criminal proce

VICTIM [NAME] [DATE] PAGE 3 OF 3 attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MAltRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Fede

VICTIM [NAME] [DATE] PAGE 3 OF 3 attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

VICTIM [NAME] [DATE] PAGE 3 OF 3 attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

on this issue, or i elects another attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

VICTIM [NAME] [DATE] PAGE 3 OF 3 attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MAltRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Fede

VICTIM [NAME] [DATE] PAGE 3 OF 3 attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

s issue, or if Ms. selects another attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In iv Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736- CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order