Epstein Secrets

and irk EFTA00108505 U.S. Department of Justice United States Marshals Service Prisoner Custody Alert Notice Prisoner Name: Prisoner Number: EPSTE:N JEFFREY EDWARD 76318054 L Original Original Offense Offense Code Description Arrest Date 18 U SC 371 SEX TRAFFICKING 0609 Six Offerisw

ork DATE: August 13, 2019 TC — FROM SUBJECT: File removal On August 13, 2019 at approximately 4:25 pm, Associate removed the original file for Epstein, Jeffrey N76318-054. I was able to make copies of all forms and place in his duplicate file. EFTA00108476 EPSTEIN JEFFREY EFTA00108477 07,0-2

: August 13, 2019 TC — FROM SUBJECT: File removal On August 13, 2019 at approximately 4:25 pm, Associate removed the original file for Epstein, Jeffrey N76318-054. I was able to make copies of all forms and place in his duplicate file. EFTA00108476 EPSTEIN JEFFREY EFTA00108477 07,0-20,0 EPST

O 442 (09/13) Assert Warrant AUSA Name & Teino: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of New York United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein Defendant To: Any authorized law enforcement officer ) Case No. 19CAN 49a ARREST WARRANT YOU ARE COMMANDED to arrest and bring before a Unite

85 w. GRY BLU ReG• 76318 - 054 NYM EPSTEIN JEFFREY EDWARD .6'0" .185 .. GRY 5.. BLU RW. 76318-054 NYM 11,1485. ~MN 11,08.20111 ESTEIN JEFFREY 8". EDWARD . 6'0" .5185 "GRY BLU m.5.76318-054 NYM W1, 446. 'wpm EPSTEIN JEFFREY Vo ke EDWARD " 6' 0" ' 185 GRY BLU ...76318-054 NYM EPS

ION A STATE USAGE LAST NAB*, FIRST I EPSTEIN, JE SIGNATURE OF PERSON FRIG ALIASES/MAIDEN LAST N

Oo ! Beat Mink 2122, ! --- — _ t _ — •-•mo _ — Aaide Lijm, Addres. Rook — Bacterie. — Belt B iEfold Rookt. Roodst bard soft Beeks. &digits. bard Soft — Dom Brassiere — fop. nat — Com Conto Combinauon Loek Dress Eyeglass Case E>eglassn Ohms Ilarchrolatick ilandlio

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

f the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non- Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

Y. 1655 Pike DeleePh.„,.. .ML lt Fst!ii!lefleach, IR. »CI 1 0 C) Par 1 sprat your tether rear*, taw fifty sullierdoller 2 leoseit arrest Jeffrey ipater says that pH, lir with 3 your aunt and tale ad bar bra liar trots le that I Cerrees7 S Us. 6 0. Iles ray have you bra lira with P

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of hi s obligations pursuant to th

have prepared documents to charge at least one of Mr. Epstein's lady friends in state court. If they can push

thei't NW ass. sir. O. 00 yea know who Doff fey Slow NI A. N. Pie. 0. Clo yet hew who J'effroy Mnia 14/ A. 0. That.. the layer who flest and Spytein os ynr nYlf. tleht7 500•11 au In. Noun •Pmetted piet hally any M. LIN101.0i hey coriertetlere that ~et had with At. Soso 'Nordin.; Not Issue. y

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (1 I th Cir. 2006); United States. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States'. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004)

ASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/

n Agreement [“NPA”] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does

oes the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein’s performance of his obligations pursuant to the

ng the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. Fo

ismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ___

of the civil proceedings in the “interests of justice” until the “expiration” of the Non- Prosecution Agreement [“NPA”] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of any

oes the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein’s performance of his obligations pursuant to the

ng the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. Fo

no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

oceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non-Prosecution EFTA00222789 Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE N

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

ndersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessa

oceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non-Prosecution EFTA00222799 Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of an

es the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE N

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).