Epstein Secrets

court in Doe'. Epstein, No. 9:08- cv-80I19-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the scheduled deposition date. Jane Doe's counsel agreed, and then Brunel's attorney cancelled the rescheduled deposition date. Brunel's counsel represented that Brunel was outside the count

witz would write to tell the Justice Department that "Epstein never targeted minors." Letter from Gerald Lefcourt & Alan Dershowitz, July 6, 2007 to U.S. Atty.'s Office for the S.D. Fla (attached as Exhibit 30). Now, nearly a decade later, there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that the minor girls who

v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 8 v. Epstein, Case No. 09-80802 (S.D. Fla. 2009)). 6 See also (A-11 at ¶ 6) (citing Jn re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008)). References to "Supp.A." correspond to the supplemental appendix filed by the Post simultaneous with this bri

. Hyde and Richard A. Russell of Peeples, Earl & Blauk, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill P002011, Asst. U.S. Auy., Miami, Keith E. Saxe, David C. Shilton and Ellen J. Durkee, Dept. of Justice, Washington. D.C., for arn

8's eighteenth birthday, and when Jane Doe #19 was seventeen years old. [NB: The police report describes a pattern of activity, including dates when Jane Doe #18 was seventeen years old.] Neither Jane Doe #18 nor #19 ever returned to Epstein's home. Although we have not yet obtained Jane Doe #18's teleph

n, Jr., Miami, Fla., for trace's order of pretrial detention. The Echeverry. EFTA00191673 668 828 FEDERAL REPORTER, 2d SERIES Leon B. Kellner, U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before RONEY, Chief Jud

ied female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- year-old girl. 17 (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or

win, Van Nuys, Cal. (Eric A. Goodwin, Carruth & Goodwin, Van Nuys, Cal., with him on the briefs), for defendant-appellant Affleck. Brent D. Ward, U.S. Atty., Salt Lake City, Utah (David Schwendiman, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the brief), for plaintiff' appellee U.S. in No.

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the

e damage, and the statute is either unconstitutional or the attorney is transcending his authority under a valid statute. *525 Francis G. Caffey, U.S. Atty., of New York City (William C. Fins. Vincent H. Rothwell, and Cornelius J. Smyth, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants. Root, Clark,

ages of a prepubescent fe- male known as Jane Doe. Images of this young girl had been found on several individuals' computers and were labeled with Jane Doe's actual name. NCMEC analysts used this information to locate the girl in Indianapolis, Indiana. Law enforcement officials interviewed Jane Doe. Sh

a sex offense conviction. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a), 18 U.S.C.A. *859 Philip M. Koppe, Asst. U.S. Any., argued, Kansas City, MO (Bradley J. Schlozman, U.S. Atty., Cynthia L. Phillips, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant. Stephen C. Moss, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, argued, Kansas City, MO (Raymo

S OF AMERICA. Respondent. / PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ COME NOW petitioners Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe 2, as well as rnavants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 ("the victims" I), to respond in opposition to Mr. Dershowitz's motion for limited intervent

d as Exhibit 29) Later, Dershowitz would write to tell the Justice Department that " Letter from Gerald Lefcourt & Alan Dershowitz, July 6, 2007 to U.S. Atty.'s Office for the S.D. Fla (attached as Exhibit 30). Now, nearly a decade later, there should be no doubt in anyone's mind that the minor girls who

ed on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 8 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by I G D.C. JUL 0 9 2008 STEVEN M LANIMORE CURS U.S. DISE c s.o.or FLA • W.P.B. GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY

. Hyde and Richard A. Russell of Peeples, Earl & Blank, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill Ponzoli, Asst. U.S. Any., Miami, Keith E. Saxe, David C. Shilton and Ellen J. Durkee, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for ami

ction. Introduction This lawsuit arises from a pending federal criminal action concerning, among other things, an alleged assault of the plaintiff Jane Doe, who, according to her complaint, on "numerous occasions" provided "massages" to Epstein with "no credentials to provide massage therapy" and was "

. Hyde and Richard A. Russell of Peeples, Earl & Blank, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lchtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill Ponzoli, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Keith E. Saxe, David C. Shilton and Ellen J. Durkee, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for am