25
Total Mentions
22
Documents
563
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013501_sub_003 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013795
at pituitary cells and their neoplastically transformed relatives, the GH3 strain, demonstrate a decrease in Do in the latter (Guillemin et al, 1983; Mandell, 1986). The number of examples of the use of D2 on orbital point geometries in explorations of physiological and pharmacological regulation are incr
ependent fluctuations with fractional (hierarchical) time scaling exponents that were sensitive to psychotropic drugs 212 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013712 (Mandell and Russo, 1981; Knapp and Mandell, 1983; Russo and Mandell, 1984a; Russo and Mandell, 1986). Similar bifurcating and power law kinetics were found i
dic, but we shall see that the ways they fail to be ergodic (and thus remain in the conceptual context of ergodic measures) are descriptively useful (Mandell and Selz, 1997a). The emergence of many statistical approaches to characterizing these motions have been accompanied by the expected controversies ab
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013501_sub_002 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013700
inically relevant global electrophysiological phenomena such as Magoun’s (1954) brain stem evoked EEG and behavioral arousal (Nicolis, 1986; Selz and Mandell, 1992; Mandell and Selz, 1993). In the early 1940’s, using the pre-publication results of similar analog computer studies (Levinson, 1949), the Camb
nt global electrophysiological phenomena such as Magoun’s (1954) brain stem evoked EEG and behavioral arousal (Nicolis, 1986; Selz and Mandell, 1992; Mandell and Selz, 1993). In the early 1940’s, using the pre-publication results of similar analog computer studies (Levinson, 1949), the Cambridge mathemati
n omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (same); United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same). "Acquisition of evidentiary details is not the function of the bill of particulars." United States
Page: EFTA00030943 →EFTA00040628
13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 7. 8 United States v. Mahaffy, 446 F. Supp. 2d 115 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) 10 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 19 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 6 United States v. Middendorf, No. 18-CR-36 (JPO), 20
EFTA00095587
n omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (same); United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same). "Acquisition of evidentiary details is not the function of the bill of particulars." United States
EFTA01318899
arket cond0ons es they rotate lo ION CONS. Dislance Based Prizing. Region 6 FedEx has audled MIS Niblll So( correct pieces. Weight and service. Any Mandell made we reflected In Ow Knobs anion We calculated your charges based on a dmensonalwaghl 01 23.0 bs..241x 161 x W.divided by 194. RELEASE SIGNATURE
EFTA00839387
ileen Alexanderson fr-" Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 19:38:58 +0000 Was it Schiff Hardin maybe? There was some guy named Robert (I think) Mandell who set up Narrows back in '96. He was originally at a different firm (someplace smaller with four names - like Rubin somebody somebody and somebod
EFTA01655437
ng, and suspected murders, with investigators linking him to the deaths of a suspected informant, a trucking company owner, and even his own father. Mandell, once sentenced to Illinois' Death Row and later briefly hailed as an exoneree after a court found FBI agents fabricated evidence in a 1990 case, r
EFTA00022669
resident EFTA00022670 FORM APPROVED OMB No. 21204042 WIRED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF PIANSPORTAT1ON IIIIIIIPUU. AVIATION marrnmnosetesta 'Mandell, Aan0WARWAL CENTER AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION APPIJCAT1CN CERT: ISSUE DATE REGIVIVROSTANUMBER N -7g., r 8 MOO& de ITO f copier A Si '64:1 °NuM.4 S
EFTA01274941_sub_002 - EFTA01274941_200
HIP INT Symbol: BX Exchange: NYSE EAI: $2,961 Cisrant yield: 6.50% Sep IS, 14 1,113.000 32 319 35,972.05 40.960 45,58848 9,616.43 ST Your !Mandell Advisor: SCOTT STACKMANLYLE CASRJEL 212-821-7C00/800-308-3140 Fixed income Corporate bonds and notes Pr - coteined from Independent quotation b
EFTA00102999_sub_001 - EFTA00102999_100
783 (1977) 76, 79, 80, 82 United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 266, 268, 269 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 267 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 248 United States v. Mariamma Vijua, No. 15 Cr. 2
EFTA00102999_sub_003 - EFTA00102999_239
nous discovery in combination with some guidance about what is most relevant can vitiate a need for further particulars, see, e.g., United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (denying request for particularization of alleged misrepresentations where the indictment was thirty-four
EFTA00099941_sub_001 - EFTA00099941_100
83 (1977) 76, 79, 80, 82 United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (AJN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 266, 268, 269 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 267 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 248 United States v. Marianna Vljua, No. 15 Cr. 2
EFTA00099941_sub_003 - EFTA00099941_239
inous discovery in combination with some guidanceabout what is most relevant can vitiate a need for further particulars, see, e.g., United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (denying request for particularization of alleged misrepresentations where the indictment was thirty-four
EFTA00077606_sub_001 - EFTA00077606_100
783 (1977) 76, 79, 80, 82 United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 266, 268, 269 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 267 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 248 United States v. Mariamma Vijua, No. 15 Cr. 2
EFTA00077606_sub_003 - EFTA00077606_239
nous discovery in combination with some guidance about what is most relevant can vitiate a need for further particulars, see, e.g., United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (denying request for particularization of alleged misrepresentations where the indictment was thirty-four
EFTA00039421_sub_001 - EFTA00039421_100
783 (1977) 76, 79, 80, 82 United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 266, 268, 269 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 267 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 248 United States v. Mariamma Vijua, No. 15 Cr. 2
EFTA00039421_sub_003 - EFTA00039421_239
nous discovery in combination with some guidance about what is most relevant can vitiate a need for further particulars, see, e.g., United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (denying request for particularization of alleged misrepresentations where the indictment was thirty-four
EFTA00095067_sub_001 - EFTA00095067_100
S. 783 (1977) 52, 53, 54, 55 United States v. Mahabub, 13 Cr. 908 (AJN), 2014 WL 4243657 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) 174, 176, 177 United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) 175 United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2010) 163 United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 (1971)
epare his defense, (2) avoid unfair surprise to the defendant at trial, and (3) preclude a second prosecution of the same offense." United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)). On the other hand, the Court must balance these interests against the harm to the Government from restr
Page: EFTA00023905 →
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
Bortnovsky
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Trippe
PersonSurname reference in documents
Mahabub
PersonSurname reference in documents
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Gibson
PersonAmerican guitar manufacturer

Giglio
PersonNER artifact - legal term or document reference misclassified as person
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
Walsh
PersonAmbiguous surname - primarily appears in legal case citations within Epstein court documents
Perez
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

Audrey Strauss
PersonActing U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York who announced charges against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2020

Rivera
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents

Torres
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
Annabi
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
Campo Flores
PersonPerson referenced in documents
Tracy
PersonAmbiguous first name - refers to multiple Tracys including Tracy Chapell and Tracy Lofaro in Epstein documents
Bonventre
PersonSurname reference in documents