ed on the recent bail opposition in the Maxwell case, I believe the differences in counsel/discovery access are as follows: Accommodation Maxwell Rivera Review of electronic discovery (NB: each defendant has laptop access) 13 hours per day/7 days per week (91 hours total) 3 hours per day/7 days

it a declaration, from an appropriate person at the BOP, explaining in more detail why the accommodations provided to Maxwell cannot be extended to Rivera. Based on the recent bail opposition in the Maxwell case, I believe the differences in counsel/discovery access are as follows: Accommodation Maxw

Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

it a declaration, from an appropriate person at the BOP, explaining in more detail why the accommodations provided to Maxwell cannot be extended to Rivera. Based on the recent bail opposition in the Maxwell case, I believe the differences in counsel/discovery access are as follows: Accommodation Maxw

es in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera (USANYS) We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

MCC for personal health concerns. We have two court orders in place to address these issues: (1) a laptop order, which requires the MCC to provide Rivera access to a laptop for three hours per day; and (2) a videoconference order, which requires the MCC to make available four hours of videoconferencin

Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

irreconcilable breakdown with his former counsel. Since this fall, Judge Engelmayer has become increasingly frustrated with the MCC's treatment of Rivera. In particular, he's cited their failure to provide Rivera with adequate accommodations to review discovery and meet with his lawyers, who refuse to

mpting Judge Darrin Gayles to accuse the government of gamesmanship and wasting the court's time. The case has been slowed down by the dispute over Rivera's assets, which Rivera insists are needed to pay his attorneys, and the former Congressman has accused the prosecutors of misconduct. A Politico art

les to accuse the government of gamesmanship and wasting the court's time. The case has been slowed down by the dispute over Rivera's assets, which Rivera insists are needed to pay his attorneys, and the former Congressman has accused the prosecutors of misconduct. A Politico article from 2022 noted th

ompting Judge Darrin Gayles to accuse the government of gamesmanship and wasting the court's time. The case has been slowed down by the dispute over Rivera's assets, which Rivera insists are needed to pay his attorneys, and the former Congressman has accused the prosecutors of misconduct. A Politico ar

les to accuse the government of gamesmanship and wasting the court's time. The case has been slowed down by the dispute over Rivera's assets, which Rivera insists are needed to pay his attorneys, and the former Congressman has accused the prosecutors of misconduct. A Politico article from 2022 noted th

isparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera : We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

nference calls obtained through the Federal Defenders. At the moment, there's not a concern, at least from Judge Engelmayer, that the amount of time Rivera has for videoconferences and electronic discovery review is insufficient for trial preparation, although defense counsel has stated that they may r

nference calls obtained through the Federal Defenders. At the moment, there's not a concern, at least from Judge Engelmayer, that the amount of time Rivera has for videoconferences and electronic discovery review is insufficient for trial preparation, although defense counsel has stated that they may r

isparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera : We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

Disparities in Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

erence calls obtained through the Federal Defenders. At the moment, there's not a concern, at least from Judge Engelmayer, that the amount of time Rivera has for videoconferences and electronic discovery review is insufficient for trial preparation, EFTA00013335 --- PAGE BREAK --- although defense

f privacy, potential embarrassment and sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details."' United States v. Rivera, 799 F.3d 180, 184 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee's note). "The exclusion, however, is not absolute" as Rule 412(b) p

ugh the review of potential or abstract disputes,' Digital Props., Inc. v. City of Plantation, 121 F.3d 586, 589 (11th Cir.1997)." United States v. Rivera, 613 F.3d 1046, 1050 (11th Cir. 2010); see also Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1278 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The ripeness doctrine prevent[s] the courts

5b697174cae7423648e71> "This is a murder story,” Rivera said. “It's not an immigration story." By Meagan

iver in our team's decision to request that she receive so much time to review her discovery. Based on my read of the transcript from this morning's Rivera conference, it sounds like Rivera is not even using all the time he has now. By contrast, my understanding is that Maxwell is using up the full time

update the Court regarding Justin Rivera's access to discovery at the Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC") and his access to counsel. i. Mr. Rivera's Access to His Laptop As we previously indicated, Mr. Rivera received his laptop on Tuesday, December 8, 2020, while in the Special Housing Unit (

L-Tier Inmate a Number a Desilva, Michael 55381-066 Brown, Chad 70786-050 Fernandez, Leonardo 86824-054 Rivera, Jose 72008-054 Babdrow, Lorenzo 76157-054 Reyes, Frankie 79102-054 Jimenez, Edward 79466-054 Rodriguez, Daniel 91278-054 Estevez, Steven

9-1230(L), 2002 WL 34244994, at *2 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2002); United States v. Salameh, 152 F.3d 88, 120 (2d Cir. 1998) (per curiam); United States v. Rivera, 844 F.2d 916, 923 (2d Cir. 1988). The Second Circuit has held that language nearly identical to that in Epstein's NPA is not enough to overcome th

ant failed to appear at deposition pursuant to subpoena and failed to appear at the hearing on plaintiffs motion for order to show cause). 4. Ms. Rivera did not notify the undersigned that she would not (or could not) attend her properly noticed deposition. Nor did Ms. Rivera contact the undersigned

, defendant has not presented any evidence suggesting that the BOP was involved in the investigation or prosecution of this case." United States v. Rivera, No. 13 Cr. 149, 2015 WL 1540517, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2015); see, e.g., United States v. Merlin, 349 F.3d 144, 155 (3d Cir. 2003) (holding that

Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera EFTA00018659 --- PAGE BREAK --- : We are in the process of finalizing our response to the Maxwell/Rivera issue. We intend to explain that the discovery and counsel access accommodations that have been provided to Maxwell and Rivera, respectively, resul

Counsel and Discovery Access for Ghislaine Maxwell and Justin Rivera Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 15:33:39 +0000 Attachments: 2020.12.31 Best Decl _ re_ Rivera and_Maxwell_(v.3).docx; _ _ 2020.12.3I_Letter on_Rivera_anci Maxwell_discovety_and_counsel_accest(v.2). I didn't line edit this but I did catch a

ant failed to appear at deposition pursuant to subpoena and failed to appear at the hearing on plaintiffs motion for order to show cause). 4. Ms. Rivera did not notify the undersigned that she would not ( or could not) attend her properly noticed deposition. Nor did Ms. Rivera contact the undersigned