4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 5
Mentions
25333-3394 500 LEE STREET. EAST. SMITE 800 CHARLESTON. WEST VIRGINIA 25301 June 19, 2008 Mr. John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: TELEPHONE I304) 345-7250 FACSiMILE 004
Page: EFTA00013785 →support both a narrow or broad application of the federal criminal law, "the tie must go to the defendant." United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. and Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S (June 2, 2008), Slip Op. at 6. 2 February 25, 2003 Trafficking in Persons National Security Presidential Directive. EFTA
Page: EFTA00013788 →previously set forth herein, and as more fully explained in other submissions related to this case, the recent Supreme Court decisions in Santo and Cuellar make this attempted stretch of the law improper. EFTA00013796 --- PAGE BREAK --- ALLEN GUTHRIE MCHUGH & THOMAS, PLLC Mr. John Roth June 19, 200
Page: EFTA00013797 →7 Kenneth W. Starr ; To Call Writer Directiy: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: June 19, 2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: I again want to thank you for t
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012130 →to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court’s very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court’s interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonstrate the subst
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012131 →to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court’s very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court’s interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonstrate the subst
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012137 →e this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal statutes, and respectfully request that the Office of the Deputy Attorney General end federal involvement in this matter so that the State of Florida may resolve this case appropriately. Summary of the Facts Mr. Epstein has maint
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012143 →eth W. Starr To II • r i ly: Los Angeles, California 90017 vAwcicirkland.com June 19, 2008 Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States De . artment of Justice Dear Mr. Facsimile: Dir. Fax I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that
Page: EFTA00013989 →to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonstrate the sub
Page: EFTA00013990 →Entities connected to both Office of the Deputy Attorney General and Cuellar

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONKirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Santos
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSONEvans
PERSON
Mark Filip
PERSON
Bailey
PERSONMurrell
PERSON
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON
Munich
LOCATION
Johns
PERSON
the Executive Branch
ORGANIZATIONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON