S Ellis, a 16 firm of which two attorneys, Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz had 17 been representing Jeff

notifying the executive office of the U.S. Attorneys 15 that you were seeking employment with Kirkland S Ellis, a 16 firm of which two attorneys, Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz had 17 been representing Jeffrey Epstein. Is that correct? 18 A We may -- we may get into it a little bit later, 19 but I th

S Ellis, a 16 firm of which two attorneys, Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz had 17 been representing Jeff

o craft 12 an NPA addendum to address that issue. 13 Do you -- are you -- are you aware that MI received a copy of the NPA in November when Ken Starr wrote a letter to asking her to review the 22.55 portion of it? Do you -- do you remember that issue? A I remember that the issue was appealed to

initially by 19 letter to , raising an issue that was new to -- 20 that had not been raised with you, and that is what led to 21 your letter to Ken Starr on December 4. 22 A I will accept the timeline. Q Okay. 24 A It's difficult without all the documents -- Q Sure. EFTA00009116 --- PAGE BR

initially by 19 letter to , raising an issue that was new to -- 20 that had not been raised with you, and that is what led to 21 your letter to Ken Starr on December 4. 22 A I will accept the timeline. Q Okay. 24 A It's difficult without all the documents -- Q Sure. EFTA00009116 --- PAGE BR

member the phone call, 16 but from the e-mail, I accept that it happened. 17 Q So, what had been your knowledge and relationship 18 of -- with Ken Starr of Kirkland S Ellis -- 19 A Right. 20 Q -- up to this point? 21 A So, I had been an associate at Kirkland, I think I 22 indicated, what was

member the phone call, 16 but from the e-mail, I accept that it happened. 17 Q So, what had been your knowledge and relationship 18 of -- with Ken Starr of Kirkland S Ellis -- 19 A Right. 20 Q -- up to this point? 21 A So, I had been an associate at Kirkland, I think I 22 indicated, what was

12 A They wanted to argue -- they, being defense 13 counsel, wanted to argue why we should not pursue this case. 14 Q And in this case, it was Starr and Lefkowitz from 15 Kirkland & Ellis, and Lilly Ann Sanchez, I believe who met 16 with you. 17 A Fair. I remember it was Starr and Lefkowitz

07 meeting, right? 15 A Yeah. 16 Q With Ken Starr and company. He is not present 17 at -- to -- a

07 meeting, right? 15 A Yeah. 16 Q With Ken Starr and company. He is not present 17 at -- to -- a

t I wanted to bring him into this. 13 Q So, the -- we know he was present at the December 14 14, 2007 meeting, right? 15 A Yeah. 16 Q With Ken Starr and company. He is not present 17 at -- to -- according to our investigation, at any other case 18 with defense counsel. Others are. His ASAC, i

sex crimes. Disgusted with I recalls thinking he’d found | In Acosta, the chief saw from confronting a man w connections. But it turned out that Ac Starr’s high-powered multir And while Acosta had a ster clerking for future Supreme only argued two cases befor At the time, Reiter did not one had to loo

uy Ricu TERSON wing depressed and withdrawn of America’s most famous lawyers, and before lon h lessly, her parents watched her | celebrity lawyer— Ken Starr, the former solicitor ner is a . i 3 a wed the end of their rope, they had had Bill Clinton impeached for perjury —would & s w ° ie move, Mary had

sh Limbaugh out of prison for his alleged illegal drug use—and Jay Lefkowitz, a defense attorney who'd worked with US attorney R. Alexander Acosta at Ken Starr's law firm. And so in September, the US attorney's office reached a for- mal agreement with Epstein’s team: the United States would defer federal pros

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi

reality," noting that there was no evidence that Epstein committed federal sex trafficking offenses. The letter was signed by former Epstein lawyers Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger and Lilly Ann Sanchez, as well as Epstein's current attorney, Martin G. Weinberg. Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/p

From: Sent: To: Subject: J [[email protected]] 3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM Martin Weinberg [[email protected]]; Weingarten, Reid L ; Ken Starr Fwd: Herald „Lilly Ann Sanchez Privileged - Redacted - Forwarded message --- From: Lilly Sanchez Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM Subject: Herald To

inberg [[email protected]]; Weingarten, Reid L ; Ken Starr Fwd: Herald „Lilly Ann Sanchez Privileged - Redac

phanie Thacker. We respectfully request and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to speak with you in person about this matter. Kind Regards, Kenneth W. Star and Jay P. Leflcowilz Kirkland & Ellis LLP The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may

upsets your plans too much. From: Ami Sheth [mailto: Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Dear Mr. Roth, As promised in yesterday's letter to you, we have attached the following

To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay L

From: Sent: To: Subject: J [[email protected]] 3/5/2019 11:19:19 PM Martin Weinberg Fwd: Herald Weingarten, Reid I; Lilly Ann Sanchez Ken Starr Privileged - Redacted -- Forwarded message --- From: Lilly Sanchez‹ Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM Subject: Herald To: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gma

Herald Weingarten, Reid I; Lilly Ann Sanchez Ken Starr Privileged - Redacted -- Forwarded message --- Fr

reality," noting that there was no evidence that Epstein committed federal sex trafficking offenses. The letter was signed by former Epstein lawyers Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger and Lilly Ann Sanchez, as well as Epstein's current attorney, Martin G. Weinberg. Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/p

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi

Evidence ...............................60 3. September 7, 2007: Acosta, Other USAO Attorneys, and FBI Supervisors Meet with Epstein Attorneys Starr, Lefkowitz, and Sanchez ...............................................................................................62 VI. SEPTEMBER 2007: TH

of the March 3 deadline “to provide CEOS time to engage in a thorough review.” 106 appeal an adverse determination by him within the DOJ. Ken [Starr] and I appreciate that you understand this and have no objection to our seeking appellate review within DOJ. Starr, Lefkowitz, and Martin Weinbe

to the NPA, two attorneys from the firm of Kirkland & Ellis, one of the largest law firms in the country, contacted the USAO on Epstein’s behalf: Kenneth Starr, former federal judge and Solicitor General, who was serving as Dean of Pepperdine University School of Law while of counsel to the firm; and Jay Le

lies, and whose own lawyer said is an impressionable woman who sometimes fantasizes. On July 28, 1998, Monica Lewinsky’s lawyers struck a deal with Starr under which she was given total immunity in exchange for her cooperation and testimony. On July 29, 1998, the President’s lawyer announced that an ag

ous and influential figures of the age including William F. Buckley, Noam Chomsky, Rabbi Meyer Kahana, Rabbi Adan Steinzaltz, Justice Antonin Scalia, Ken Starr, Elie Wiesel, Vaclav Havel, Golda Meir, Red Auerbach, William Kunstler, Roy Cohn, Norman Mailer, Patrick Buchanan, Norman Podhoretz, Bill O’Reilley,

ardy decision to engage in a surreptitious sexual relationship with a White House intern at a time when he knew he was under intense investigation by Kenneth Starr, a somewhat puritanical prosecutor and was subject to a lawsuit for sexual harassment by a vindictive woman who was represented by politically motiva

phanie Thacker. We respectfully request and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to speak with you in person about this matter. Kind Regards, Kenneth W. Starr and Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis LLP The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may

To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay L

upsets your plans too much. From: Ami Sheth [mailto: Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Dear Mr. Roth, As promised in yesterday's letter to you, we have attached the following

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

n Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, Kenneth Starr, Guy Lewis, and Martin Weinberger among them—to e

hat carry a mandatory 20-year sentence? Was he able, with his limitless assets and heavy-hitting lawyers—Alan Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, Kenneth Starr, Guy Lewis, and Martin Weinberger among them—to escape equal justice? Michael Reiter, the former Palm Beach police chief, certainly thinks so. He ga

1 PM jeff epstein [[email protected]] Fw: Ken Starr Aiming High as Head of Baylor Sent via BlackBerry

From: Sent: To: Subject: 12/27/2010 9:04:41 PM jeff epstein [[email protected]] Fw: Ken Starr Aiming High as Head of Baylor Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T From: "Newsmax.com" <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:03:04 GMT To: Rep

n Dershowitz (remember OJ. Simpson?) and Kenneth Starr (remember Monica Lew insky?). Jack Goldberger o

he% getting his money's worth from his large legal team, which includes Harvard Law School Pro- fessor Alan Dershowitz (remember OJ. Simpson?) and Kenneth Starr (remember Monica Lew insky?). Jack Goldberger of West Palm Beach, who's also on the team, told Post columnist Jose Lambiet in November "This cas

n, which led to the impeachment (but not conviction) of the president after it was revealed he had sex with a young White House intern. Like Acosta, Starr had worked at the presti- gious law firm Kirkland & Ellis. Epstein also tapped Jay Lefkowitz, also of Kirkland, who worked as a domestic policy advis

. All-star attomeys Epstein’s tactic: hire the most aggressive and politically connected lawyers that his money could buy. At the top of his list: Kenneth Starr, a Repub- lican icon because of his pursuit of Bill Clinton during the Whitewater investigation, which led to the impeachment (but not conviction) of

U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

0530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa

, is that Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz were power players in Washington - men who might help Acosta down the road. Readers will be quite familiar with Starr's background. Lefkowitz was director of cabinet affairs and deputy executive secretary to the domestic policy council under President George H.W. Bus

re exalted jobs in the future. Nor is the explanation particularly plausible. Acosta isn't the first prosecutor to face a scorched earth defense. Ask Ken Starr about this. I don't doubt that Acosta regarded escaping the wrath of the defense team as a benefit of reaching the plea deal. But I don't believe thi