rorism cases to large numbers of victims. See, e.g., United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at 4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division's Victim Notification Program, U.S. Dep't of Justice, hittp://goo.gl/6H6IEk (last visited Dec. 4, 2013). 201 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). DAVID SCHO

, 2005 WL 2875220, at 4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division's Victim Notification Program, U.S. Dep't of Justic

orism cases to large numbers of victims. See, e.g., United States v. Ingrassia, No. CR-04-0455ADSJO, 2005 WL 2875220, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2005); Criminal Division’s Victim Notification Program, U.S. DEP’T OF Justice, http://goo.gl/6H6IEk (last visited Dec. 4, 2013). HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014073 --- PAGE BREAK --- 20

or division without the express written approval of the United States Attomey(s) in each affected district and/or the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division. USAM 9-27.641 (Multi-District (Global) Agreement Requests). 12 The government acknowledges that this Court has nonetheless ruled that "as a matter

(OFAC) e Treasury Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture (TEOAF) U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) e Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, Criminal Division (AFMLS) e Counterterrorism Section, Criminal Division (CTS) e National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) e Office of International Affairs, Criminal D

rime victims rights representative. See CVRA Subcommittee Memo, supra note 66, at 1 (noting that Deborah Rhodes, Counselor to the Asst. Atty. Gen. of the Criminal Division, served on the subcommittee drafting this language). 416 At another point in its memorandum, the CVRA Subcommittee refers to /8 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6),

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded ma

saffiant bé -4 b7c -4 dated and related Search Warrant dated October 18, 2005 hereby sealed until further order of the Court. | The Clerk of Court, Criminal Division is hereby ordered to seal said Search Warrant and Affidavit and Application for Search Warrant until further order of the Court. lt is further ORDE

ngton, Vermont, and find a federal prosecutor who is very smart, has a good case and is talented in court. In the Justice Department itself, there’s the Criminal Division, and the two litigating sections—the public integrity section, where | was for 10 years, and the fraud section. They’ve had their ups and downs. As a

regard to charging Ghislaine Maxwell. As I mentioned, MI (copied) has been chosen as the permanent ASAC for the NYO's Violent Crime/Gang Branch of the Criminal Division. =will be coordinating with you, and the rest of the team as we move forward. To rehash some of the points regarding Maxwell to get I= up to speed

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the ' request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded

99:25- 300:8). Detective Recarey shared the same view that “it wasn’t any.justice served.” Appendix at 2 (Recarey Depo. 496:1-2). 26. Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Andrew Lourie, in a transmittal letter with the prosecution memo of Assistant U.S'. Attorney Ann Marie Villafana, told

ewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The records included emails, letters, memoranda, and investigative materials. OPR also collected an

arm to our investigation from the release, that we have the original materials. He also offered to serve as a POC if we have any questions. Chief, Criminal Division United States Attorney's Office, SDNY EFTA00009968

any thanks, as always, to our partners from the Southern District of New York. Last but not least, I extend my sincere congratulations to the FBI's Criminal Division in New York for their hard work on this investigation. EFTA00010473

to be particularly successful. '°? The federal government seems to share that view. The Justice Department created a Public Integrity Section within the Criminal Division in 1976, !>4 and in the four decades since, federal prosecutors have [*893] aggressively prosecuted conduct of state and local officials that it det

ewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The records included emails, letters, memoranda, and investigative materials. OPR also collected and

ewed hundreds of thousands of records from the USAO, the FBI, and other Department components, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, the Criminal Division, and the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys. The records included emails, letters, memoranda, and investigative materials. OPR also collected and

th regard to charging Ghislaine Maxwell. As I mentioned, (copied) has been chosen as the permanent ASAC for the NYO's Violent Crime/Gang Branch of the Criminal Division. will be coordinating with you, and the rest of the team as we move forward. To rehash some of the points regarding Maxwell to get up to speed w

our review of this case is limited both factually and legally. We have not looked at the entire universe of facts in this case. It is not the role of the Criminal Division to conduct a complete factual inquiry from scratch.” (CEOS letter at p. 1). Indeed, entire subject areas relevant to the inquiry were not considered

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded ma