ail the plans later today. Dr. Jerecki 12:33PM Please call. Cecilia LM for Jerry Goldsmith re has lawyer letter been sent out yet, 12:43PM Amy Evans 12:50PM Calling for Congressman Tom Reynolds regarding the lune 14th annual dinner with Bush. NRCC Business Advisory. G 12:51PM Spoke to Miles

ail the plans later today. Dr. Jerecki 12:33PM Please call. Cecilia LM for Jerry Goldsmith re has lawyer letter been sent out yet, 12:43PM Amy Evans 12:50PM Calling for Congressman Tom Reynolds regarding the lune 14th annual dinner with Bush. NRCC Business Advisory. G 12:51PM Spoke to Miles

ail the plans later today. Dr. Jerecki 12:33PM Please call. Cecilia LM for Jerry Goldsmith re has lawyer letter been sent out yet, 12:43PM Amy Evans 12:50PM Calling for Congressman Tom Reynolds regarding the lune 14th annual dinner with Bush. NRCC Business Advisory. G 12:51PM Spoke to Miles

or intimidation. These are the elements required by the statute, and they are not met here. Although CEOS could, perhaps, point to United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007) as a case that, standing alone, involved wholly intrastate conduct, the facts of that case are far different in key

co-conspirators. None of this type of activity comes close to the facts regarding Mr. Epstein. Finally, but significantly, the prostitution ring in Evans was not, in fact, entirely intrastate as the companion case of one of the Evans co-defendants makes clear. See, United States v. Madison, 477 F.3d 1

or intimidation. These are the elements required by the statute, and they are not met here. Although CEOS could, perhaps, point to United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11" Cir. 2007) as a case that, standing alone, involved wholly intrastate conduct, the facts of that case are far different in key re

s co-conspirators. None of this type of activity comes close to the facts regarding Mr. Epstein. Finally, but significantly, the prostitution ring in Evans was not, in fact, entirely intrastate as the companion case of one of the Evans co-defendants makes clear. See, United States v. Madison, 477 F.3d 13

EST, GHOST, HOST: MACHINE!” with the programmer Richard Evans, who recently designed Versu, an AI- based platform for interactive storytelling games. Evans’ work emphasizes the social interaction of the games’ characters, who react in a spectrum of possible behaviors to the choices made by the human play

ply. See United States v. Anati, 457 F.3d 233, 236-37 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Davenport, 445 F.3d 366, 371 (4th Cir. 2006); United States v. Evans-Martinez, 448 F.3d 1163, 1167 (9th Cir. 2006). The Third, Seventh, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits have held the opposite. See United States v. Irizarr

amounted to, at most, the solicitation of prostitution, is unprecedented. Since prostitution is fundamentally a state concern, (see United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, n.1 (11th Cir. 2007) (federal law “does not criminalize all acts of prostitution (a vice traditionally governed by state regulation)”

amounted to, at most, the solicitation of prostitution, is unprecedented, Since prostitution is fundamentally a state concern, (see United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, n.1 (11th Cir. 2007) (federal law “does not criminalize all acts of prostitution (a vice traditionally governed by state regulation}’

until stepping down to run for United States Senate. To his right are Representative Leonard Lance of New Jersey and former Gov. Chris Christie. Mel Evans/Associated Press ", "type":"text"}],"identifier":". _anf-container- 5", "layout": "image- container", "role": "container", "type": "container''],"ide

vate Jewish school when he was a child, was entitled to proceed anonymously because he feared retaliation and ostracism from his community); Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. Pa. 2001) (sexual assault victim granted use of pseudonym); Doe v. Smith, 105 F. Supp. 2d 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (victim

tions to Compel and Replies thereto: 1. Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. P.A. 2001) (denying pr

to rely on the following case as supplemental authority in connection with the above referenced Motions to Compel and Replies thereto: 1. Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. P.A. 2001) (denying protective order where alleged sexual assault victim did not demonstrate a serious specific injury a

e deterred from reporting such crimes. See Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D.Pa.2001) (granting ano

-cv-80119-KAM Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 7 of 13 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page? must be shown with specificity. See Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. P.A. 2001). Thus, Plaintiffs have not met their burden of persuasion. Id. Plaintiffs fail to show good cause in that the

c., 528 U.S. 167, 180-81 (2000); see also, e.g., Young Apartments, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter, 529 F.3d 1027, 1038 (11th Cir. 2008) (quoting Harris v. Evans, 20 F.3d 1118, 1121 (11th Cir. 1994) (en banc)). Moreover, "a plaintiff must demonstrate standing separately for each form of relief sought." Friend

solicitation under State law. After all, prostitution, even when the allegations involve minors, is fundamentally a State concern, United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, n.1 (11th Cir. 2007) (noting that federal law "does not criminalize all acts of prostitution (a vice traditionally governed by state

very inflammatory, and when the actual facts are heard by everyone, I believe that will change EFTA00021241 --- PAGE BREAK --- everyone's mind,' Evans said. 'It is only fair, and it only gives me due process to be able to tell my side of my story and answer any questions anyone might have.' Evans

ional CrimeAgeney v Ahaeha (2016) 1 WL 4375.CA: R (River EattSupplies Ltd)o Nottingham Crown Court (2017) 4 WLR 135 (Admin). pass 28-29,36-37. 3 R (Evans) o Director of the Serious Fraud Office (2003) 1 WLR 299. pass 11-12; R (Entp Financing Team Limited) v Director ofthe Serious Fraud Offlee(2006) WL

d of college basketball, including trying to verdict bribery charges against two defendants for making cash payments to university coaches. U.S. v. Evans, 17 Cr. 684 (ER), US. v. Person, 17 Cr. 683 (LAP). EFTA00025172

amounted to, at most, the solicitation of prostitution, is unprecedented. Since prostitution is fundamentally a state concern, (see United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, n.1 (11th Cir. 2007) (federal law “does not criminalize all acts of prostitution (a vice traditionally governed by state regulation)”

rld of college basketball, including trying to verdict bribery charges against two defendants for making cash payments to university coaches. U.S v. Evans, 17 Cr. 684 (ER), U.S. v. Person, 17 Cr. 683 (LAP). EFTA00026623