secution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court’s very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court’s interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonstra

secution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court’s very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court’s interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonstra

ity applied in construing a statute, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous

criminal statute could support both a narrow or broad application of the federal criminal law, "the tie must go to the defendant." United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. and Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S (June 2, 2008), Slip Op. at 6. 2 February 25, 2003 Trafficking in Persons National Security Presi

t cannot be shown that Mr. Epstein violated any of the three federal statutes identified by prosecutors. As the Supreme Court's recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar make clear, federal law may not be stretched in that manner, and the current federal investigation relies, as its foundation, on imperm

ecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal criminal law—powerfully demonst

05 PM, I'll check with the agents now. (USANYS) < > wrote: (USANYS) < wrote: From: Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 6:01 PM To: Subject: Re: Santos Felix Do you happen to know if Santos still has an immigration hold? He believes that the hold was lifted. If it's not lifted then there's no reaso

. Da Watch Shift: Lt. reported I/M's Cave #86164-054(Codes #108/113), Contreras #89520-053(Code #113), Fernandez #86824-054(Codes #115/331), Santos #86638-054(Code #108), placement on the Special Housing Unit. Correctional assignments Internal, Attorney Conf., SHU #4, 10-South #2, Rec. Off