Epstein Secrets

l. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC v. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

e interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it.” Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein’s case is more idiosyncratic than most. As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein’s first motion to stay

third parties; . . . (v) the public interest[;] . . . (vi) the good faith of the litigants (or the absence of it) and (vii) the status of the cases.” Microfinancial, 385 F.3d at 78 (citations omitted). In considering those factors, the United States respectfully recommends to the Court that all of the factors wei

. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefi

osyncratic circumstances of the case before it.” Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein’s case is more i

bsence of it) and (vii) the status of the cases.” Microfinancial, 385 F.3d at 78 (citations omitted). In consideri

1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

al., 5 Plaintiffs, I JUNE 12, 2009 6 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 9 10 7 8 11 12 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: 14 15 16 ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 18205 Biscayne Bou

interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's first motion to sta

it against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ- Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discovery on behalf of the criminal investig

interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's first motion to sta

996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lance• Mgt. Group LLC v. Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

e interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra , 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. EFTA00213030 As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's fir

. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. H. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's first motion to sta

1996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC I Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

e interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra , 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. EFTA00222794 As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's fir

. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLCI Lauer. 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's first motion to sta

1996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC I Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

e interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra , 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. EFTA00222784 As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's fir

1996); Shell Oil Co. , 866 F. Supp. at 540-41. Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC I Lauer , 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.). Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether

e interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it." Microfinancial, supra , 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein's case is more idiosyncratic than most. EFTA00222804 As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein's fir