Epstein Secrets

in your office hopefully before the year ends. Roy Black RB/wg Enclosure Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stu

ward. If you email me some dates when you are available this month, we can schedule a short meeting in your office hopefully before the year ends. Roy Black RB/wg Enclosure Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00225784 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scan' A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF. MARIA NEYR

a short meeting in your office hopefully before the year ends. Roy Black RB/wg Enclosure Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00225784 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scan' A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF. MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STU

at (a) force or coercion would be used to cause Owens to engage in a criminal sex act or (b) that Owens was under the age of 18." (emphasis added). The Eleventh Circuit's interpretation of the statute makes perfect sense: were § 1591 not limited in that fashion, it would threaten to criminalize a host of localized be

d Tactics in Disregard of the United States Attorney's Manual are Used 9. In June 2007, subpoenaed the investigating agent of Epstein's attorney, Roy Black, in a clear effort to invade the defense camp. The subpoena was specifically drafted to discover the investigator's contacts with all prospective wi

to engage in a criminal sex act or (b) that Owens was under the age of 18.) (emphasis added). Again, none of these factors is present in this case. The Eleventh Circuit's interpretation of the statute makes perfect sense: were § 1591 not limited in this fashion, it would threaten to criminalize a host of localized be

her issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Goud? Gerald B. Lefcourt cati a .O i b m Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00176530 • C.) c EFTA00176531 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Al

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Gam( A Lift --- Gerald B. Lefcourt cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Alan I )ershowit/ EFTA00190138

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States, Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language

questions or comments you may have and am available to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Very truly yours, Goudf? Gerald B. Lefcourt a t41^- 1 A— l t Alan Dershowitz MIA_CEOS_00099 EFTA00191466

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's' decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

udge Marra also had scheduled a hearing on Epstein's motion to quash grand jury subpoenas for the computer equipment removed from Epstein's home by Roy Black's investigator when they learned of the stale investigation. This was postponed to allow plea negotiations and eventually was withdrawn pursuant to th

penalty ... if, in fact, someone ... is caught and convicted.") (emphasis added). Accordingly, Masha's Law cannot lawfully be applied in this case. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States I, Siegel 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998), is virtually on point. In Siegel, the defendant pleaded guilty to charges under

urther submission in which we address more specifically the applicable law once we have had the benefit of narrowing the focus at our meeting. cc: Roy Black, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. y y UT Gerald B. L tb urt Qf 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000754 EFTA00184628 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in eases whcre there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"

able to discuss this and any other issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Gocil? Gerald B. Lefcourt cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Alan I )ershowit, EFTA01660187

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Muriel!, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mum!! court wrote that, under the "plain language

our earliest convenience. Very truly yours, §c4-14 /( 0=1-vb --a Gerald B. Lefcourt hi4640 L..) 6Th Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00284197 Tab A EFTA00284198 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan D

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Mini! court wrote that, under the "plain language

issues at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Go-a( Gerald B. Lefcourt alak,,,.1 44A),,5 Alan Dcrshowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00226777 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Family Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor Alan Dershowitz Harvard Law

gainst strict liability, especially since it applies in cases where there is no sexual contact at all with any person, let alone with a real minor. The Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States Murrell, supra, reflects this same understanding of the statute. The Murrell court wrote that, under the "plain language"