Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00183407_email_016_sub_002 - EFTA00183407_325

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

informed. Petitioner's rights under the CVRA have not been violated. Therefore, her emergency petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: It Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Respondent ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct cop

be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: It Assistant U.S. At

e case to federal district court, where it was ultimately transferred to the Southern District of Florida. The League filed a Motion to Quash DER's Notice of Removal, which motion was argued before Judge William Hoeveler on July 10, 1991, and was granted on September 10, 1991. The federal court held that there

EFTA00233329_sub_006 - EFTA00233329_549

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

of this examination and express the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents the health and well-being of Ms. B cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ASSIS I A for EFTA00233830 C.M.A., Plaintiff, Sealed vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. Cape 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Do

Ms. B cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ASSIS I A for EFTA0023

EFTA00066350

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

/25/07 Sloman Itr to Davis; 11/8/07 Lefkowitz to Sloman; 11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?); 11/28/07 Starr to Fisher; 11/29/07 Starr to Acosta; 11/30/07 Acosta to Lefkowitz; 12/4/07 Acosta to Starr; 12/5/07 Starr to Acosta; 12/6/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz; 12/7/07 Sanchez to Sloman; 12/7/07 Sta

with NPA 2/18/10 Letter to from Black regarding attorney's fees 3/20/11 Letter from Acosta Transcript of 6/12/09 Motion Hearing in Jane Doe case Notice of Removal (DE#1) in 08-CV-8084-KAM Jane Doe case Redwell with Epstein's Motion to Seal Non-Pros Agreement Epstein New York Case (Redwell) 12/10/10, 3/1/11,