with NPA 2/18/10 Letter to from Black regarding attorney's fees 3/20/11 Letter from Acosta Transcript of 6/12/09 Motion Hearing in Jane Doe case Notice of Removal (DE#1) in 08-CV-8084-KAM Jane Doe case Redwell with Epstein's Motion to Seal Non-Pros Agreement Epstein New York Case (Redwell) 12/10/10, 3/1/11,

ly where it was filed within 30 days after the last defendant was served). Second, in accordance with section 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 21, 2008, Third, in accordance with section 1446(6), all of the defendants join this Petition and consent to removal. District courts may

32: the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; Defendant Epstein is a citizen of the U.S. Virgin Islands; and Defendant is a citizen of New York. (Notice of Removal ¶ 2.) As Plaintiff is a citizen of Florida, complete diversity exists and this Court's jurisdiction is alleged to be proper. As for Defendants cla

er) 6/12/09 Breach Ltr file folder) — post it says Epstein Defense 3 (Kelly) 7/29/11 Letter to from regarding NPA being a confidential document Notice of Removal (DEtf1) in 08-CV-8084-KAM Jane Doe case Redwell with Epstein's Motion to Seal Non-Pros Agreement Epstein New York Case (Redwell) 12/10/10, 3/1/11,

ly where it was filed within 30 days after the last defendant was served). Second, in accordance with section 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 21, 2008. Third, in accordance with section 1446(b), all of the defendants join this Petition and consent to removal. 4 District courts m

tion that she is a citizen of Florida, Defendants question whether she might actually be a citizen of Georgia because her mother lives in Georgia. (Notice of Removal, DE I, pp. 7-8, n.6). Defendants fail to point out, however, that there is a question of whether Defendant Epstein is actually a citizen of Florida

e case to federal district court, where it was ultimately transferred to the Southern District of Florida. The League filed a Motion to Quash DER's Notice of Removal, which motion was argued before Judge William Hoeveler on July 10, 1991, and was granted on September 10, 1991. The federal court held that there

e case to federal district court, where it was ultimately transferred to the Southern District of Florida. The League filed a Motion to Quash DER's Notice of Removal, which motion was argued before Judge William Hoeveler on July 10, 1991, and was granted on September 10, 1991. The federal court held that there