Epstein Secrets

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States Attorne or CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, I electronically fi

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United St

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: it appears from a brief review of some of Epstein's discovery responses that Epstein has simply made a blanket asserti

f the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: it appears from a b

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States' Beeks , 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States' Diaz , 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States Davis , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

not aware of any "special circumstances" that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the "expiration" of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: ssistant United States Attorne 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: Facsimile:

you and your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Offi

en no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (1 I th Cir. 2006); United States. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States'. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004)

ion” of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafa

no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. Diaz, 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. Davis, 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).

ion” of the NPA. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafa

ismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (11th Cir. 2006); United State