Epstein Secrets

n attorney's work is for his client's advantage, opposing counsel or adverse parties should not gain the use of that work through discovery." In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081 (4i° Cir. 1981). As is required by the Sixth Amendment, a criminal defense attorney must exert his best efforts to convince the

gned has not found any Eleventh Circuit cases that address this issue, the other Circuits that have addressed the issue have done so inconsistently. The First Circuit has held that a company may maintain even its attorney-client privilege and work-product privilege in materials that it discloses to the U.S. Attor

n attorney's work is for his client's advantage, opposing counsel or adverse parties should not gain the use of that work through discovery." In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081 (4i° Cir. 1981). As is required by the Sixth Amendment, a criminal defense attorney must exert his best efforts to convince the

gned has not found any Eleventh Circuit cases that address this issue, the other Circuits that have addressed the issue have done so inconsistently. The First Circuit has held that a company may maintain even its attorney-client privilege and work-product privilege in materials that it discloses to the U.S. Attor

y requirements. Sec. 607. Safe ID Act. Sec. 608. Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act. Sec. 609. Definition of vehicle. Sec. 610. Authorization of John Doe DNA indictments. Sec. 611. Transitional housing assistance grants for child victims of domestic violence, stalking, or sexual as- Copr. C West 2008

its position clear that no reduction was warranted, adding that it could not present "a more vigorous argument" because of the plea agreement. Id. The First Circuit held that although the Government did not formally oppose the reduc- tion, it effectively opposed it in the memorandum. Id. Clark has no bearing on