ther cases and matters which necessitate additional time for a response, including, without limitation, a special set hearing and upcoming trial in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant’s

d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (4th DCA 2007). A reading

usiness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

siness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the Case 9:08-cv-80119

usiness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

ed business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr.

a cover for was after III posted this information on called III yelling that he had had a third daughter named Note: During report he mentioned John Doe No.2 was actually John UNCLASSIFIED EFTA00020518 --- PAGE BREAK --- UNCLASSIFIED Re: 50D-NY-3027571, 10/27/2020 W Nichols, date of birth who

l as 3 11/29 through 12/1 Jane Doe Los Angeles 4 11/30 through 12/1 Los Angeles 5 11/30 through 12/1 New York City 6 11/30 through 12/1 John Doe I Los Angeles 7 11/30 through 12/1 TBD Interim:hen Michigan 8 12/1 through 12/2 Dr. Rhode Island 9 12/2 Florida 1) Not at same hotel a

From: (NY) (FBI)" E IME> To: " Subject: Fwd: John Doe begs judge not to name names in Epstein gal pal case Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 13:42:45 +0000 Importance: Normal do we know who this is in the post a

From To: Cc: Subject: RE: John Doe begs judge not to name names in Epstein gal pal case Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:20:58 +0000 Importance: Normal Ok makes sense, thank you FBI New Y

ng to be organized and have a nice presentation. I appreciate it. I'm not trying to be critical. I'm just saying it's really not necessary. On the John Doe -- John Doe? Jane Doe, Jane Doe issues, I have no problem signing an order. The only question is what form of order. And because there are several

LLAND & KNIGHT Attorneys for Intervenors Julie Brown and Miami Herald Media Company BY: CHRISTINE N. WALZ KRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP Attorneys for John Doe Defendants BY: PAUL M. KRIEGER SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•• (212) 805-0300 EFTA00082164 L1JMGIUC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13

l that "he did not need to [testify] because the evidence presented in this case was anemic at best." "If his name was not Harvey Weinstein and was John Doe, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office would have never brought these charges," Aidala said. With jury deliberations near, here's how the trial

l that "he did not need to (testify) because the evidence presented in this case was anemic at best." "If his name was not Harvey Weinstein and was John Doe, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office would have never brought these charges," Aidala said. With jury deliberations near, here's how the trial

l that "he did not need to (testify) because the evidence presented in this case was anemic at best." "If his name was not Harvey Weinstein and was John Doe, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office would have never brought these charges," Aidala said. With jury deliberations near, here's how the trial

was going to go there, that today counsel has raised the idea that the compiled-for standard applies. And I've seen that before — it comes out of John Doe v. John Doe Corporation of the Supreme Court — I get that, that compiled-for is measured for at the time of the request. I just don't know whether

was going to go there, that today counsel has raised the idea that the compiled-for standard applies. And I've seen that before — it comes out of John Doe v. John Doe Corporation of the Supreme Court — I get that, that compiled-for is measured for at the time of the request. I just don't know whether

ty of a child being sexually exploited." According to the Journal Star, "The FBI Omaha field office disseminated images of the man, they refer to as John Doe 42. FBI agents are trying to identify this man believed to have key information about the identity of a child being sexually exploited." The Journa

e was brought to Memphis from the Hardee Correctional Institution in Bowling Green, Florida, in order to face the charges." Love "was indicted as a John Doe in 2015 after DNA evidence connected him to the rape of a 21-year-old woman in Raleigh in the summer of 1986. In 2017, the FBI linked that DNA with

further appears to argue that the “required records” exception should be limited to “highly regulated business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr. John Doe, however, the Court held contrary to Defendant’s assertion and consistent with the case l