3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
3 05 2010 Page 29 of 36 Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra-Johnson Page 29 meaning of the statute would prevail. See United States v. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous
meaning of the statute would prevail. See United States v. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous criminal laws to be interpreted in favor of the defendants subjected to them. See United
Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra-Johnson Page 25 profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted). ... FN15. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, "'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include( ] all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 C.J
of inertia upon the party that can best induce Congress to speak more clearly and keeps courts from making criminal law in Congress's stead. ... In Santos. the Court was faced with the interpretation of the term "proceeds" in the federal money laundering statute, 18 . §1956. "The federal money-launder
aning of the statute would prevail. See United Statcs I. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: See argument in sections (2) and (3) that follow which represent the predicate for the rule of lenity issue discussed in B. 9 EF
including future contingencies such as lost profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted]. ... FN I5. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, " 'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include' all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 Da
, and the rule of lenity applied in construing a statute, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail. See United States'. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos supra, at 2025: 3 See argument in sections (2) and (3) th
including future contingencies such as lost profits and opportunities or damages based on speculation. [Citation omitted]. ... FN15. According to Corpus Juris Secundum, " 'Compensatory damages' and 'actual damages' are synonymous terms ... and include[ all damages other than punitive or exemplary damages." 25 C.J
Entities connected to both Santos and Corpus Juris Secundum

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
the United States Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
James Baker
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Merritt
PERSONGradwell
PERSONSanchez
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Martinez
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION