ropriate defense team members. First, I would like to address the Section 2255 issue! As I stated in my December e letter, my understanding is that the Non-Prosecution A reement entered into between this Office and Mr. Epstein responds to Mr. Epstein's desire to reach global resolution of his state and federal crimin

at recommendation. Community control must follow that term of incarceration. (Emphasis in original.) EFTA00212503 As I specified in that letter, the Non-Prosecution A reement calls for "confinement twenty-four hours a day." In response to that letter, agreed that he would revise the state plea agreement to inclu

participation, yet he was not present. EFTA01659898 KENNETH STARR, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 6 Instead, Mr. Epstein elected to ne otiate the Non-Prosecution A eement, and on September 12, 2007, counsel for the United States Garcia, and and counsel for Mr. Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt Lefkowitz and Goldberg

EI. R. TIN, ESQ. JULY 22, 2008 PAGE 2 object to the names on the list and chose not to make any objections. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution A reement as modified, Mr. Epstein and all of his representatives are required to treat and as "victims of an enumerated offense." Furthermore, Mr

Re: Jaffrey Epstein Dear Jay; Several things have come to my attention that Seem contrary to your client intending ta abide by his obligations uder the Non-Prosecution A ereement. As you know, that agreement requires our Office to inform you of potential breaches to give you and your client the opportunity to respond