er CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney'

EOURMW.ccen RENATO C. STABILE 11104110WONSEinvcom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN filedmeneldwurlaw.wco BY HAND DELIVERY June 25, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th

LE slabIle&elcourIlawcorn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN [email protected] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th

ing, which must occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States A tome First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: It. Alexander AGA. Attorney AUSA 2This is contingent, however, on being able to provide adequate notice of

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 1771

ny further comments by the close of business on Tuesday. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Jeffrey Sloman EFTA00189928 First Assistant United States Attorney cc: It Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafafia Based upon the language of this statute, your statement tha

kOuNsw.com RENATO C. STABILE stablefcaurlaw.com FAITH A. FRIEDMAN flriolmsnalccostlawcom BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h

elcourew.com RENATO E. STABILE FabliSokswilawoom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN IM•cimweelcoutlaw.com BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h

contact for the Middle District of Florida is Criminal Chief who can be contacted a The point of contact for the Southern District of Florida is First Assistant United States Attorney who can be reached at EFTA00205881 All Assistant United States Attorneys subsequently assigned to this matter must be app

ontact for the Middle District of Florida is Criminal Chief who can be contacted at . The oint of contact for the Southern District of Florida is First Assistant United States Attorney who can be reached at All Assistant United States Attorneys subsequently assigned to this matter must be appointed as Speci

defense counsel has reserved the right to challenge such litigation). 8. The ability to negotiate effectively. Letter dated October 25, 2007, from First Assistant United States Attorney to the Honorable Edward B. Davis (Ret), attached hereto as Exhibit B. 14. The attorney representative recommended by the Sp

007. There must be closure in this matter. By: Enclosure cc: R. Alex .S. Attorney AUS Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States A tomcy First Assistant United States Attorney 'This is contingent, however, on being able to provide adequate notice of the change of plea and sentencing. The sooner that

rom former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mils case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States A

er CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney'

er CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney'

December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta By: Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney 'This is contingent, however, on being able to provide adequate notice of the change of plea and sentencing. The sooner that

ndividuals for whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them w in enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney used similar language in tying the names "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, sec December 6, 2007 letter from

Chief of the Public Integrity Section at DOJ at the request of AAG Fisher. By October 2007 Mr. would leave command were Criminal Division Chief, First Assistant USA the SDFL to become AG Fi her's Chief of Staffs Above Mr. in the SDK's chain of and finally, U.S. Attorney Acosta. Prior to seeking approval

eave the SDFL to become AAG Fisher's Chief of Staff.2 Above Mr. Lourie in the SDFL's chain of command were Matthew Menchel, Criminal Division Chief, First Assistant USA Sloman and finally, U.S. Attorney Acosta. Prior to seeking approval to return an indictment, Epstein's legal team had been actively working to

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 appli