ise, the Magistrate Judge’s decision in this case compelling 2 Defendant relies upon Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2008 WL 2105024 (S.D. Fla. 2005) and Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary’s Donuts, Inc., 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001), in which the Court applied the

turns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

turns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

turns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

2 Defendant relies upon Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2008 WL 2105024 (S.D. Fla. 2005) and Dunkin Don

urns] arises 'from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

turns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at •2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

urns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

urns] arises from the need, if tax laws are to function properly, to encourage taxpayers to file complete and accurate returns"). In Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2005 WL 2105024 at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2005), the court agreed that "[i]ncome tax returns are highly sensitive documents" and that courts should be relu

soline $1,003.97 14 5/20/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $1,001.31 15 5/21/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $998.65 16 5/21/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $995.24 17 5/22/2005 Main Street News $6.66 Newspapers $988.58 18 5/22/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $985.17 19 5/22/2

soline $1,003.97 14 5/20/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $1,001.31 15 5/21/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $998.65 16 5/21/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $995.24 17 5/22/2005 Main Street News $6.66 Newspapers $988.58 18 5/22/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $985.17 19 5/22/2

soline $1,003.97 14 5/20/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $1,001.31 15 5/21/2005 Main Street News $2.66 Newspapers $998.65 16 5/21/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $995.24 17 5/22/2005 Main Street News $6.66 Newspapers $988.58 18 5/22/2005 Starbucks Coffee Co. $3.41 Coffee $985.17 19 5/22/2