"One of the great masters of massage." _ Rot, Leach, from the foreword Steve Capellini, LMT Michel Van Welden, PT, NT k4 *reword by Robin Leach EFTA00008020 --- PAGE BREAK --- OTWG an SEM Mas

"One of the great masters of massage." _ Rot, Leach, from the foreword Steve Capellini, LMT Michel Van Welden, PT, NT k4 *reword by Robin Leach EFTA00008020 --- PAGE BREAK --- OTWG an SEM Mas

"One of the great masters of massage." _ Rot, Leach, from the foreword Steve Capellini, LMT Michel Van Welden, PT, NT k4 *reword by Robin Leach EFTA00008020 --- PAGE BREAK --- OTWG an SEM Mas

reement [2] Leach argues that the government's advocacy for the § 4B1.5(a) enhancement breached the plea agreement. The government stipulated that Leach's base offense level was 24, but the enhancement, if applied, would have increased Leach's offense level to 34. Leach further contends that becaus

ommerce to attempt to persuade, induce, and entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). In sentencing Leach, the district court declined to apply enhancements advocated by the government under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.5(a) or, alternatively, under § 4B1.5(b). Leac

lau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover

Accordingly, any compelled testimony that provides a "lead or clue to a source of evidence of such [a] crime" is protected by Fifth Amendment. SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491, 494 (E.D. PA. 2001). See supra. Questions seeking "testimony" regarding financial assets or transactions would, if answered, ri

Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d49!, 494 (E.D. PA. 2001). The Cou

te." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover, the act of production itself may implicitly communicate statements and, for this reason, the Fift

te." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Moreover, the act of production itself may implicitly communicate statements and, for this reason, the Fift

ate." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). The Request for Production Plaintiffs claim that the "act of production doctrine" does not encompass reque

te." See United States v. Neff, 315 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Blau v. United States, 340 U.S. 159 (1950); SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491, 494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Add new case from my e-mail of yesterday: (Court in Englebrick v Worthington Industries Inc 670 F Supp2d 10

.,,15--T,•4”flot a l tiera a ic.,;(,?„, :-: •.,..ir, :,,t1- : .‘,,,. a V. aka% „.. .:,. . . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION ' CHARGE U.S. v. Leach, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS Internet Internet chat room conversations with "14 year-old"; arranged to meet for sex; 2422(b); 2423(b); 2253 (criminal

Sar« Pm Kerry for Presdent Kessler, Jack Kincaid, Kristina ,.m,,., I So<ref Kosslyn, Steve EFTA00183019 imtrAavistetienitt Leese, Nick so Leach, Robin 852-813-0180 Ron Shulman Lundberg Marc MOTO) Mast Industries Pres John Welch Mast Industries - Milan McMillen, C. Thomas Chairman McMi

B. Binion, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Briskman & Binion, P.C., Mobile, AL. For Specialty Fuels BTU, LLC, Defendant: James B. Newman, LEAD ATTORNEY, Helmsing, Leach, Herlong, Newman & Rouse, P.C., Mobile, AL. For internal use only SDNY_GM_00056891 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-00197

ccordingly, any compelled testimony that provides a "lead or clue to a source of evidence of such [a] crime" is protected by Fifth Amendment. SEC v Leach, 156 F.Supp.2d 491,494 (E.D. PA. 2001). Questions seeking "testimony" regarding names of witnesses, leads to phone or travel records, or financial