Epstein Secrets

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez Defendant also objects to the Magistrate Judge’

2009). Significantly, in both Preferred Care and Ruskin the Court affirmed the decision of a Magistrate

ccordingly, the fact that federal tax returns cannot be accessed by the general public does not aid the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there are two alternative grounds for holding that Defendant’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privileg

c., 2008 WL 4500258 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Ruskin Co. v. Greenheck Fan Corp., 2009 WL 383349 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Significantly, in both Preferred Care and Ruskin the Court affirmed the decision of a Magistrate Judge rejecting a higher standard for production of tax returns, holding that, despite an arguable

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there

2009). Significantly, in both Preferred Care and Ruskin the Court affirmed the decision of a Magistrate