kes it clear that there is a compelling need for any net worth discovery not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege. 5 Defendant relies upon Myers v. Central Florida Investment, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (11th Cir. 2010) for its “stipulation” argument. In Myers, however, the district court heard tes

Myers, however, the district court heard testimony regarding each of the defendant’s net worth. There was no unilateral statement of net worth in Myers as Defendant wishes to create in the instant case. To the extent that Defendant relies upon the Court’s holding in Myers regarding the reasonablen

ures. Such a stipulation more than satisfies any necessity for the disclosure of the tax returns or any additional net worth information. See e.g., Myers v. Central Florida Investments, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (I Ith Cir. 2010)(reasoning that a compensatory award of $103,622.09 and a punitive damage award

of $506,847.78 for 5 years of sexual harassment and sexual touching was reasonable). Unfortunately, the parties were unable to reach a agreement. Myers clearly demonstrates that Epstein's offer to agree to a net worth in excess of $50,000,00 is reasonable in light of the allegations made by Jane Doe

here was no unilateral statement of net worth in Myers as Defendant wishes to create in the instant case

Amendment privilege. 5 Defendant relies upon Myers v. Central Florida Investment, Inc., 592 F.3d 120

ttachment and cognitive inhibition in children's memory for a stressful event. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 262-290. Redlich, A., Myers, J., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (2002). A comparison of two forms of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 7,312-28. Alexander, K

ll Kirkland & Ellis Kobre & Kim Kuck Baxter Lewis Brisbois Lewis Longman Lipcon Margulies McGuireWoods Mintz Levin Morgan Lewis O'Melveny & Myers EFTA00030767 --- PAGE BREAK --- Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said Monday that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau should be part of the

gazine Mayer Brown McGuireWoods Milton Laurence Miner Orkand Morgan Lewis Morrison & Foerster Mukasey Frenchman Nutter McClennen O'Melveny & Myers Orrick Outten & Golden Paul Weiss Pierce Bainbridge Proskauer Rose QEB Hollis Whiteman Reed Smith Riemer & Braunstein Robinson Bradshaw Rop

s Littler Mendelson Mayer Brown McDermott Will McKool Smith Morgan Lewis Morrison & Foerster Munger Tolles Norton Rose Fulbright O'Melveny & Myers Ogletree Deakins Oles Morrison Outten & Golden Park Jensen Bennett EFTA00032563 --- PAGE BREAK --- The Florida House of Representatives on Fr

ute that he views as unconstitutional. __ First, there is significant judicial approval of this proposition. Most notable is the Court's decision in Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). There the Court sustained the President's view that the ' ' Statute at issue was unconstitutional without any m

rgan Lewis Mukasey Frenchman EFTA00032907 --- PAGE BREAK --- Albert at Schlam Stone. Read full article Nixon Peabody Norton Rose O'Melveny & Myers Ogletree Deakins Orrick Paul Hastings Pepper Hamilton Perkins Coie Pierce Bainbridge Pryor Cashman Reed Smith Rivkin Radler Ropes & Gray S

ALM BEACH COUNTRY CLUB SMITH,PAGE W MYERS,RICHARD ROONEY,TIMOTHY J ROGER DEAN

lson Lynn Jackson Milbank LLP Mintz Levin Morgan Lewis Morrison & Foerster Motley Rice Niddrie Addams Nix Patterson Norton Rose O'Melveny & Myers Odom Sparks Orrick Paul Hastings Paul Weiss Porzio Bromberg Quinn Emanuel Rumberger Kirk Ryan Whaley Seyfarth Shaw Siebman Forrest Skadden