Epstein Secrets

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez Defendant also objects to the Magistrate Judge’

d) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject

ccordingly, the fact that federal tax returns cannot be accessed by the general public does not aid the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there are two alternative grounds for holding that Defendant’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privileg

ired conduct with the testimonial privilege. 120 U.S. at 2043, 530 U.S. at 35 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject [defendant’s] compulsory self- incrimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there

d) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject