Epstein Secrets

efkowitz [[email protected]] Sent: y, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM To: , Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: e. onference Call with Bert Ocariz Marie -I will not be able to get back to you until tomorrow. However, some of the questions he raised cause me some serious concern. 1. Can we get a copy

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

13 26:2,18 27:24 29:1,16 34:5 38:12,13 39:11 41:14 making 42:7 43:9,24 44:5 man 12:24 mandate 7:24 8:20 8:21 103 many 2023 31:3 35:17 42:1 Marie 2:14 4:9 MARRA 1:11 Martin 2:17 4:16 Master 21:2 32:16 matter 20:15 37:13 44:19 matters 21:11 may 3:3 5:1 7:2,10 9:9,12 10:4,17 11:19 13:17,

or your convenience, I attach a copy of that letter.) It was my understanding that you deemed my allegations serious enough to forward my letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for further investigation, and it was my impression that 0PR was going to look into the allegations raised in my letter. I must say that I w

26 forward with charges in this case. Lourie forwarded a copy of the prosecution memorandum to Menchel. Lourie’s transmittal message read: Marie did a 50 [sic] page pros memo in the Epstein case. I am going to start reading it tonight. . . . It’s a major case because the target is one of t

] 11 CHAPTER TWO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT PART ONE: FACTUAL BACKGROUND I. OVERVIEW In the following sections in this chapter, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) details the significant events leading to, and during, the federal investigation of Epstein; the negotiation and signing of the NPA; and the