als are stamped with control numbers SDNY_GM_02742303 through SDNY_GM_02742750. One of the items included in this production is the final report of the Office of Professional Responsibility ("OPR") regarding the resolution of the 2006-2008 criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District

Resolution of Its 2006- 2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation Dear Mr. The Office of Professional Responsibility has been investigating allegations that prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida improperly resolved a federa

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

ting us know. I defer to you and to our chiefs on what if anything should be communicated to the Post about this, but the background is: the FBI and the Office of Professional Responsibility are meeting with victims to discuss OPR's findings in connection with their investigation of the Southern District of Florida's dealings with victi

Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York City, NY 10007 Dear Ms. Strauss: Enclosed is the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Report of Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal I

ates Attorney's Office Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York New York City, NY 10007 Dear Ms. Strauss: Enclosed is the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Report of Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal I

ting us know. I defer to you and to our chiefs on what if anything should be communicated to the Post about this, but the background is: the FBI and the Office of Professional Responsibility are meeting with victims to discuss OPR's findings in connection with their investigation of the Southern District of Florida's dealings with victi

ates Attorney's Office Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York New York City, NY 10007 Dear Ms. Strauss: Enclosed is the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Report of Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal I

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

additional information of which I may become aware, regarding this inquiry, to the Internal Affairs Section (IAS)/Inspection Division (INSD) or to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). I have been given the opportunity to review this statement and make any changes prior to signing it. EFTA00173630 I was instructed on 01/

or your convenience, I attach a copy of that letter.) It was my understanding that you deemed my allegations serious enough to forward my letter to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for further investigation, and it was my impression that OPR was going to look into the allegations raised in my letter. I must say that I w

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe v. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

ions. Conclusion We bring these difficult and delicate matters of misconduct to your attention not to require any disciplinary action or review by the Office of Professional Responsibility. Although we have been told that some of this misconduct has been self-reported (only after we raised these complaints in writing), we feel confide

, may notify the complainant of the result of the investigation. (10) The POC and the VRO shall refer to the Office of the Inspector General and to the Office of Professional Responsibility any matters that fall under those offices' respective jurisdictions that come to light in an investigation. (d) If the VRO finds that an employee o

ide you with the answers that you have requested in connection with the Jane Doe I. United States lawsuit. Both the referral of your allegations to the Office of Professional Responsibility and the request for our Office to "step aside" in the Jane Doe litigation are not insignificant matters. As you doubtless are aware, the position th

to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as modified by the USA's December 19' letter to Ms. Sanchez. "AUSA has self-reported to the Office of Professional Responsibility. Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product -9- EFTA00224644 A. The Morning ofJanuary 2, 2008. AUSA began his conversation with Mr. T