Epstein Secrets

the scope of whose inquiries is not to be limited narrowly by questions or propriety or forecasts of the probable result of the investigation . ." Blair v. United States , 250 U.S. 273, 282 (1919). A grand jury may "inquire into all information that might possibly bear on its investigation until it h

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

Feeney said he had gotten a telephone call from Blair Breen a few weeks ago and was also aware that La

EY CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND/OR THE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE AND/OR THE INVESTIGATOR CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: Robert Critton From: William Riley / Paul Lavery Date: August 8, 2009 Re: Epstein /-/ interview Brian Feeney) File: 8577R On Friday, August 7, 2009, Investigator Paul Lavery interviewed Bria

umber is Lavery was directed to Tiffany Avery by Blair Breen. (See that report). Investigator Tiffany

EY CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND/OR THE ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGE AND/OR THE INVESTIGATOR CLIENT PRIVILEGE To: Robert Critton From: William Riley / Paul Lavery Date: August 4, 2009 Re: Epstein / / interview Tiffany Avery File: 8577R On Tuesday, July 28, 2009, Investigator Paul Lavery interviewed Tiff

ry subpoena is necessary and relevant." In re Impounded , 241 F.3d 308, 314 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting R. Enter , supra , 498 U.S. at 298-99). See also Blair I United States , 250 U.S. 273, 282 (1919) (a grand jury witness cannot refuse to respond to a subpoena on the grounds that the information sought

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

the scope of whose inquiries is not to be limited narrowly by questions or propriety or forecasts of the probable result of the investigation . ." Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282 (1919). A grand jury may "inquire into all information that might possibly bear on its investigation until it ha

have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.